首页> 外文期刊>Environmental Science & Technology >Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis of Concentrated Solar Power with Thermal Energy Storage and Dry Cooling
【24h】

Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis of Concentrated Solar Power with Thermal Energy Storage and Dry Cooling

机译:具有储热和干冷的集中式太阳能多标准决策分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Decisions about energy backup and cooling options for parabolic trough (PT) concentrated solar power have technical, economic, and environmental implications. Although PT development has increased rapidly in recent years, energy policies do not address backup or cooling option requirements, and very few studies directly compare the diverse implications of these options. This is the first study to compare the annual capacity factor, levelized cost of energy (LCOE), water consumption, land use, and life cycle greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions of PT with different backup options (minimal backup (MB), thermal energy storage (TES), and fossil fuel backup (FF)) and different cooling options (wet (WC) and dry (DC). Multicriteria decision analysis was used with five preference scenarios to identify the highest-scoring energy backup-cooling combination for each preference scenario. MB-WC had the highest score in the Economic and Climate Change-Economy scenarios, while FF-DC and FF-WC had the highest scores in the Equal and Availability scenarios, respectively. TES-DC had the highest score for the Environmental scenario. DC was ranked 1-3 in all preference scenarios. Direct comparisons between GHG emissions and LCOE and between GHG emissions and land use suggest a preference for TES if backup is require for PT plants to compete with baseload generators.
机译:有关抛物槽式(PT)集中太阳能发电的能量备份和冷却选项的决策具有技术,经济和环境影响。尽管近年来PT的发展迅速增长,但是能源政策并未解决备用或冷却选项的要求,很少有研究直接比较这些选项的不同含义。这是第一项将PT的年产能因子,平均能源成本(LCOE),水消耗,土地使用和生命周期温室气体(GHG)排放与不同备用选项(最小备用(MB),热能)进行比较的研究。存储(TES)和化石燃料备用(FF))以及不同的冷却选项(湿式(WC)和干式(DC)),采用多标准决策分析和五个偏好方案,为每个方案确定得分最高的能源备用-冷却组合MB-WC在“经济和气候变化-经济”方案中得分最高,而FF-DC和FF-WC在“平等”和“可用性”方案中得分最高,TES-DC在“经济和气候变化-经济”方案中得分最高。环境方案:在所有优先方案中,DC排在第1-3位,如果需要PT工厂与基本负荷发电机竞争,则直接比较GHGH排放量和LCOE以及GHG排放量和土地利用之间的差异就建议选择TES。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Environmental Science & Technology》 |2013年第24期|13925-13933|共9页
  • 作者

    Sharon J. W. Klein;

  • 作者单位

    School of Economics, University of Maine, 5782 Winslow Hall, Room 206, Orono, Maine 04469-5782, United States of America;

  • 收录信息 美国《科学引文索引》(SCI);美国《工程索引》(EI);美国《生物学医学文摘》(MEDLINE);美国《化学文摘》(CA);
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号