首页> 外文期刊>Environmental Science & Technology >Comment on 'Regulatory FOCUS Surface Water Models Fail to Predict Insecticide Concentrations in the Field
【24h】

Comment on 'Regulatory FOCUS Surface Water Models Fail to Predict Insecticide Concentrations in the Field

机译:评论“法规FOCUS地表水模型无法预测田间杀虫剂浓度

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

I would like to question the suitability of the first two hypotheses for evaluating the protectiveness of the FOCUS surface water modeling approach for the EU. Hypothesis 1: "A maximum of 10% of the FOCUS step 3 PECs underestimate the measured field concentrations (MFCs)" This hypothesis is only suitable for assessing the "protectiveness" of the FOCUS sw modeling approach (which comprises a suite of 3 models and 10 generic scenarios) for the EU if all the following conditions are met: real and modeled pesticide application scenarios are similar (substance, application rate/type/season), the study areas are representative for the distribution of agro-environmental scenarios (soil, climate, crops) in the EU, and measured and modeled concentrations are indeed comparable with each other because they have the same underlying conditions (type of water body, integration period, environmental compartment, unit etc.).
机译:我想质疑前两个假设是否适合评估FOCUS地表水建模方法对欧盟的保护性。假设1:“最多10%的FOCUS步骤3 PEC会低估测得的场浓度(MFCs)”。此假设仅适用于评估FOCUS sw建模方法(包括3个模型和如果满足以下所有条件,则适用于欧盟的10种通用方案:实际和建模的农药施用方案相似(物质,施用率/类型/季节),研究区域可代表农业环境方案的分布(土壤,实际上,欧盟的气候,农作物)以及测量和模拟的浓度确实具有可比性,因为它们具有相同的基本条件(水体类型,整合期,环境区隔,单位等)。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Environmental Science & Technology》 |2013年第6期|3015-3016|共2页
  • 作者

    Stefan Reichenberger;

  • 作者单位

    Footways SAS., 10 Avenue Buffon 45071 Orleans Cedex 2, France;

  • 收录信息 美国《科学引文索引》(SCI);美国《工程索引》(EI);美国《生物学医学文摘》(MEDLINE);美国《化学文摘》(CA);
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-17 14:02:03

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号