首页> 外文期刊>Environmental Science & Technology >Environmental Impact of Buildings-What Matters?
【24h】

Environmental Impact of Buildings-What Matters?

机译:建筑物对环境的影响-有什么意义?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

The goal of this study was to identify drivers of environmental impact and quantify their influence on the environmental performance of wooden and massive residential and office buildings. We performed a life cycle assessment and used thermal simulation to quantify operational energy demand and to account for differences in thermal inertia of building mass. Twenty-eight input parameters, affecting operation, design, material, and exogenic building properties were sampled in a Monte Carlo analysis. To determine sensitivity, we calculated the correlation between each parameter and the resulting life cycle inventory and impact assessment scores. Parameters affecting operational energy demand and energy conversion are the most influential for the building's total environmental performance. For climate change, electricity mix, ventilation rate, heating system, and construction material rank the highest. Thermal inertia results in an average 2-696 difference in heat demand. Nonrenewable cumulative energy demand of wooden buildings is 18% lower, compared to a massive variant. Total cumulative energy demand is comparable. The median climate change impact is 25% lower, including end-of-life material credits and 2296 lower, when credits are excluded. The findings are valid for small offices and residential buildings in Switzerland and regions with similar building culture, construction material production, and climate.
机译:这项研究的目的是确定环境影响的驱动因素,并量化其对木制和大型住宅及办公建筑的环境绩效的影响。我们进行了生命周期评估,并使用热模拟来量化运营能源需求并解决建筑质量的热惯性差异。在蒙特卡洛分析中采样了28个输入参数,这些参数影响操作,设计,材料和外生建筑属性。为了确定敏感性,我们计算了每个参数与最终生命周期清单和影响评估分数之间的相关性。影响运营能源需求和能源转换的参数对建筑物的总体环境性能影响最大。对于气候变化,电力混合,通风率,供暖系统和建筑材料排名最高。热惯性导致平均热需求差异2-696。与大型变体相比,木制建筑的不可再生累积能源需求低18%。总累积能源需求是可比的。对气候变化的影响中位数降低了25%(包括寿命终期材料抵免额),而如果不包括抵免额,则降低2296%。该发现适用于瑞士以及具有相似建筑文化,建筑材料生产和气候的地区的小型办公室和住宅楼。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Environmental Science & Technology》 |2015年第16期|9832-9841|共10页
  • 作者单位

    Institute of Environmental Engineering, Ecological System Design, ETH Zurich, John-von-Neumann-Weg 9, 8093 Zurich, Switzerland;

    Technology Assessment Group (LEA), Paul Scherrer Institut, 5232 Viligen PSI, Switzerland;

    Institute of Environmental Engineering, Ecological System Design, ETH Zurich, John-von-Neumann-Weg 9, 8093 Zurich, Switzerland;

    Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Chalmers University of Technology, 412 96 Gothenburg, Sweden;

    Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Chalmers University of Technology, 412 96 Gothenburg, Sweden;

    Institute of Environmental Engineering, Ecological System Design, ETH Zurich, John-von-Neumann-Weg 9, 8093 Zurich, Switzerland;

  • 收录信息 美国《科学引文索引》(SCI);美国《工程索引》(EI);美国《生物学医学文摘》(MEDLINE);美国《化学文摘》(CA);
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-17 13:59:44

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号