首页> 外文期刊>Environmental Science & Technology >Quantifying Differences in Responses of Aquatic Insects to Trace Metal Exposure in Field Studies and Short-Term Stream Mesocosm Experiments
【24h】

Quantifying Differences in Responses of Aquatic Insects to Trace Metal Exposure in Field Studies and Short-Term Stream Mesocosm Experiments

机译:在野外研究和短期流介观实验中量化水生昆虫对痕量金属暴露的响应差异

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Characterizing macroinvertebrate taxa as either sensitive or tolerant is of critical importance for investigating impacts of anthropogenic stressors in aquatic ecosystems and for inferring causality. However, our understanding of relative sensitivity of aquatic insects to metals in the field and under controlled conditions in the laboratory or mesocosm experiments is limited. In this study, we compared the response of 16 lotic macroinvertebrate families to metals in short-term (10-day) stream mesocosm experiments and in a spatially extensive field study of 154 Colorado streams. Comparisons of field and mesocosm-derived EC_(20) (effect concentration of 20%) values showed that aquatic insects were generally more sensitive to metals in the field. Although the ranked sensitivity to metals was similar for many families, we observed large differences between field and mesocosm responses for some groups (e.g., Baetidae and Heptageniidae). These differences most likely resulted from the inability of short-term experiments to account for factors such as dietary exposure to metals, rapid recolonization in the field, and effects of metals on sensitive life stages. Understanding mechanisms responsible for differences among field, mesocosm, and laboratory approaches would improve our ability to predict contaminant effects and establish ecologically meaningful water-quality criteria.
机译:将大型无脊椎动物类群表征为敏感或宽容对于调查人为压力源对水生生态系统的影响以及推断因果关系至关重要。但是,我们对水生昆虫对田间和实验室或中观宇宙试验中可控金属条件下的相对敏感性的了解是有限的。在这项研究中,我们比较了短期(10天)河流中观实验和在154个科罗拉多河流的空间广泛野外研究中16个抽水大无脊椎动物家族对金属的响应。田间和外源性EC_(20)(效应浓度为20%)值的比较表明,水生昆虫通常对田间的金属更敏感。尽管在许多家庭中对金属的排名敏感度相似,但我们观察到某些群体(例如,Baetidae和Heptageniidae)的田间和中观响应之间存在很大差异。这些差异很可能是由于短期实验无法解释各种因素造成的,例如饮食中的金属暴露,田间快速重新定殖以及金属对敏感生命阶段的影响。了解造成田间,中观和实验室方法之间差异的机制,将提高我们预测污染物影响并建立具有生态意义的水质标准的能力。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Environmental Science & Technology》 |2018年第7期|4378-4384|共7页
  • 作者单位

    Research Center for Life and Environmental Sciences, Toyo University, 1-1-1 Izumino, Itakura, Oura, Gunma 374-0193, Japan,Research Institute of Science for Safety and Sustainability, National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology, 16-1 Onogawa, Tsukuba, Ibaraki 305-8569, Japan;

    Colorado Water Science Center, U.S. Geological Survey, Fort Collins, Colorado 80526, United States;

    Department of Fish, Wildlife and Conservation Biology, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado 80523, United States;

  • 收录信息 美国《科学引文索引》(SCI);美国《工程索引》(EI);美国《生物学医学文摘》(MEDLINE);美国《化学文摘》(CA);
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-17 13:56:39

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号