首页> 外文期刊>Environmental Science & Technology >How, When, and Where? Assessing Renewable Energy Self- Sufficiency at the Neighborhood Level
【24h】

How, When, and Where? Assessing Renewable Energy Self- Sufficiency at the Neighborhood Level

机译:如何,何时何地?在社区一级评估可再生能源的自给自足

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Self-sufficient decentralized systems challenge the centralized energy paradigm. Although scholars have assessed specific locations and technological aspects, it remains unclear how , when , and where energy self-sufficiency could become competitive. To address this gap, we develop a techno-economic model for energy self-sufficient neighborhoods that integrates solar photovoltaics (PV), conversion, and storage technologies. We assess the cost of 100% self-sufficiency for both electricity and heat, comparing different technical configurations for a stylized neighborhood in Switzerland and juxtaposing these findings with projections on market and technology development. We then broaden the scope and vary the neighborhood’s composition (residential share) and geographic position (along different latitudes). Regarding how to design self-sufficient neighborhoods, we find two promising technical configurations. The “PV-battery-hydrogen” configuration is projected to outperform a fossil-fueled and grid-connected reference configuration when energy prices increase by 2.5% annually and cost reductions in hydrogen-related technologies by a factor of 2 are achieved. The “PV-battery” configuration would allow achieving parity with the reference configuration sooner, at 21% cost reduction. Additionally, more cost-efficient deployment is found in neighborhoods where the end-use is small commercial or mixed and in regions where seasonal fluctuations are low and thus allow for reducing storage requirements.
机译:自给自足的分散式系统挑战了集中式能源范式。尽管学者们已经评估了具体的位置和技术方面,但仍不清楚如何,何时何地在哪里实现能源自给自足。为了解决这一差距,我们为能源自给自足的社区开发了一种技术经济模型,该模型集成了太阳能光伏(PV),转换和存储技术。我们评估了电力和供暖系统100%自给自足的成本,比较了瑞士一个程式化社区的不同技术配置,并将这些发现与对市场和技术发展的预测并列。然后,我们扩大范围,并改变邻里的构成(居住份额)和地理位置(沿不同纬度)。关于如何设计自给自足的社区,我们发现了两种有前途的技术配置。当能源价格每年以2.5%的速度增长,并且与氢相关的技术成本降低2倍时,“光伏电池-氢”配置预计将优于化石燃料和并网参考配置。 “ PV电池”配置将允许更快地实现与参考配置的对等,降低了21%的成本。此外,在最终用途较小的商业或混合用途的社区以及季节性波动较小的区域中发现了更具成本效益的部署,因此可以减少存储需求。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Environmental Science & Technology》 |2018年第4期|2339-2348|共10页
  • 作者单位

    D-MTEC, ETH Zürich, Weinbergstrasse 56/58, 8092 Zurich, Switzerland;

    D-MTEC, ETH Zürich, Weinbergstrasse 56/58, 8092 Zurich, Switzerland;

    D-MTEC, ETH Zürich, Weinbergstrasse 56/58, 8092 Zurich, Switzerland;

    D-MTEC, ETH Zürich, Weinbergstrasse 56/58, 8092 Zurich, Switzerland;

  • 收录信息 美国《科学引文索引》(SCI);美国《工程索引》(EI);美国《生物学医学文摘》(MEDLINE);美国《化学文摘》(CA);
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-17 13:56:35

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号