首页> 外文期刊>Environmental research >Valuation of environmental quality and eco-cultural attributes in Northwestern Idaho: Native Americans are more concerned than Caucasians
【24h】

Valuation of environmental quality and eco-cultural attributes in Northwestern Idaho: Native Americans are more concerned than Caucasians

机译:爱达荷州西北部的环境质量和生态文化属性评估:美洲原住民比白人更关注

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Valuation of features of habitats and ecosystems usually encompasses the goods and services that ecosystems provide, but rarely also examine how people value ecological resources in terms of eco-cultural and sacred activities. The social, sacred, and cultural aspects of ecosystems are particularly important to Native Americans, but western science has rarely examined the importance of eco-cultural attributes quantitatively. In this paper I explore differences in ecosystem evaluations, and compare the perceptions and evaluations of places people go for consumptive and non-consumptive resource use with evaluations of the same qualities for religious and sacred places. Qualities of ecosystems included goods (abundant fish and crabs, butterflies and flowers, clean water), services (complexity of nature, lack of radionuclides that present a health risk), and eco-cultural attributes (appears unspoiled, scenic horizons, noise-free). Native Americans and Caucasians were interviewed at a Pow Wow at Post Falls, Idaho, which is in the region with the Department of Energy's Hanford Site, known for its storage of radioactive wastes and contamination. A higher percentage of Native American subjects engaged in consumptive and religious activities than did Caucasians. Native Americans engaged in higher rates of many activities than did Caucasians, including commune with nature, pray or meditate, fish or hunt, collect herbs, and conduct vision quests or other ceremonies. For nearly all attributes, there was no difference in the relative ratings given by Native Americans for characteristics of sites used for consumptionon-consumptive activities compared to religious/sacred places. However, Caucasians rated nearly all attributes lower for religious/sacred places than they did for places where they engaged in consumptive or non-consumptive activities. Native Americans were less concerned with distance from home for consumptiveon-consumptive activities, compared to religious activities.
机译:栖息地和生态系统特征的评估通常包括生态系统提供的商品和服务,但很少检查人们如何通过生态文化和神圣活动来评价生态资源。生态系统的社会,神圣和文化方面对美洲原住民尤其重要,但是西方科学很少从数量上考察生态文化属性的重要性。在本文中,我探索了生态系统评估的差异,并将人们对消费性和非消费性资源使用场所的看法和评估与对宗教和神圣场所的相同品质的评估进行了比较。生态系统的质量包括商品(丰富的鱼类和螃蟹,蝴蝶和花朵,清洁的水),服务(自然的复杂性,缺乏构成健康风险的放射性核素)和生态文化属性(看上去未受破坏,风景秀丽,无噪音) )。美国原住民和高加索人在爱达荷州Post Falls的Pow Wow接受了采访,该地区位于能源部的汉福德基地,该基地以放射性废物和污染物的储存而闻名。与高加索人相比,从事消费和宗教活动的美洲原住民受试者比例更高。与高加索人相比,美洲原住民从事许多活动的比率更高,包括与自然界相处,祈祷或打坐,钓鱼或打猎,收集草药以及进行视力探索或其他仪式。对于几乎所有属性,与宗教/圣地相比,美洲原住民对用于消费/非消费活动的场所的特征的相对评级没有差异。但是,高加索人对宗教/圣地的所有评价都比对从事消费性或非消费性活动的评价低。与宗教活动相比,美洲原住民对消费/非消费活动离家的距离不太在意。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号