首页> 外文期刊>Environmental Pollution >Spatial uncertainty assessment of the environmental risk of soil copper using auxiliary portable X-ray fluorescence spectrometry data and soil pH
【24h】

Spatial uncertainty assessment of the environmental risk of soil copper using auxiliary portable X-ray fluorescence spectrometry data and soil pH

机译:利用辅助便携式X射线荧光光谱数据和土壤pH值评估土壤铜环境风险的空间不确定性

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Spatial uncertainty information of the environmental risk of soil heavy metal is crucial for precise environmental management. This study first compared three geostatistical methods for spatial simulation of soil Copper (Cu) in a peri-urban agriculture area of Wuhan city, China, that are sequential Gaussian co-simulation (CoSGS) with auxiliary in-situ portable X-ray fluorescence (PXRF) data (CoSG-S_in-situ), CoSGS with auxiliary ex-situ PXRF data (CoSGS_ex-situ), and sequential Gaussian simulation without auxiliary data (SGS). Then, the environmental risk of soil Cu was assessed based on the joint thresholds of soil Cu and soil pH in the Chinese soil environmental quality standards II. The geostatistical simulated realizations of soil Cu and soil pH were used to calculate the probabilities of exceeding the joint thresholds. Validation showed that CoSGS_ex-situ is slightly better than CoSGS_in-situ in the performance of both E-type estimates (i.e., mathematical expectation estimates) and uncertainty modelling of soil Cu, and SGS is the worst. The spatial uncertainty information of both soil Cu and soil pH was transferred to the environmental risk map through the corresponding geostatistical simulated realizations. The areas with higher probabilities of exceeding the joint thresholds mainly located in the northwest and southwest of the study area. It is concluded that CoSGS_ex-situ and CoSGS_in-situ were more cost-effective than the traditional SGS in the spatial simulation of soil Cu, and the simulated realizations of soil Cu and soil pH provide a solution to the spatial assessment of the probabilities of exceeding the joint thresholds. (C) 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
机译:土壤重金属环境风险的空间不确定性信息对于精确的环境管理至关重要。这项研究首先比较了三种用于武汉郊区农业区土壤铜(Cu)空间模拟的地统计学方法,即顺序高斯协模拟(CoSGS)和辅助原位便携式X射线荧光( PXRF)数据(CoSG-S_s-situ),具有辅助异地PXRF数据的CoSGS(CoSGS_ex-situ)和无辅助数据(SGS)的顺序高斯仿真。然后,根据《中国土壤环境质量标准II》中土壤铜和土壤pH的联合阈值,对土壤铜的环境风险进行了评估。用土壤铜和pH值的地统计学模拟实现来计算超过联合阈值的概率。验证表明,在E型估计(即数学期望估计)和土壤Cu的不确定性建模方面,CoSGS_ex-situ的性能略好于CoSGS_in-situ,而SGS的性能最差。通过相应的地统计模拟实现将土壤铜和土壤pH的空间不确定性信息转移到环境风险图中。概率超过联合阈值的区域主要位于研究区域的西北和西南。结论是,在土壤铜的空间模拟中,CoSGS-ex-situ和CoSGS-in-situ比传统的SGS具有更高的成本效益,而土壤Cu和pH的模拟实现为解决超标概率的空间评估提供了解决方案。联合阈值。 (C)2018 Elsevier Ltd.保留所有权利。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Environmental Pollution》 |2018年第9期|184-190|共7页
  • 作者单位

    Chinese Acad Sci, Inst Soil Sci, Key Lab Soil Environm & Pollut Remediat, Nanjing 210008, Jiangsu, Peoples R China;

    Chinese Acad Sci, Inst Soil Sci, Key Lab Soil Environm & Pollut Remediat, Nanjing 210008, Jiangsu, Peoples R China;

    Chinese Acad Sci, Inst Soil Sci, Key Lab Soil Environm & Pollut Remediat, Nanjing 210008, Jiangsu, Peoples R China;

    Chinese Acad Sci, Inst Soil Sci, Key Lab Soil Environm & Pollut Remediat, Nanjing 210008, Jiangsu, Peoples R China;

  • 收录信息 美国《科学引文索引》(SCI);美国《工程索引》(EI);美国《生物学医学文摘》(MEDLINE);美国《化学文摘》(CA);
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

    In-situ PXRF; Ex-situ PXRF; Sequential Gaussian co-simulation; Joint thresholds; Spatial uncertainty;

    机译:原位PXRF;异位PXRF;顺序高斯协同仿真;联合阈值;空间不确定性;

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号