首页> 外文期刊>Environmental Pollution >An integrated offshore oil spill response decision making approach by human factor analysis and fuzzy preference evaluation
【24h】

An integrated offshore oil spill response decision making approach by human factor analysis and fuzzy preference evaluation

机译:人为因子分析和模糊偏好评价的综合海上储油响应决策方法

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Human factors/errors (such as inappropriate actions by operators and unsafe supervision by organizations) are a primary cause of oil spill incidents. To investigate the influences of active operational failures and unsafe latent factors in offshore oil spill accidents, an integrated human factor analysis and decision support process has been developed. The system is comprised of a Human Factors Analysis and Classification System (HFACS) framework to qualitatively evaluate the influence of various factors and errors associated with the multiple operational stages considered for oil spill preparedness and response (e.g., oil spill occurrence, spill monitoring, decision making/contingency planning, and spill response); coupled with quantitative data analysis by Fuzzy Set Theory and the Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (Fuzzy-TOPSIS) to enhance decision making during response operations. The efficiency of the integrated human factor analysis and decision support system is tested with data from a case study to generate a comprehensive priority rank, a robust sensitivity analysis, and other theoretical/practical insights. The proposed approach improves our knowledge on the significance of human factors/errors on oil spill accidents and response operations; and provides an improved support tool for decision making. (C) 2020 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.
机译:人为因素/错误(例如经营者和组织不安全监督的不当行动)是石油泄漏事件的主要原因。为探讨积极运营失败和不安全潜在因子在海上溢油事故中的影响,已经开发了综合人类因子分析和决策支持过程。该系统由人类因素分析和分类系统(HFACS)框架组成,以定性地评估各种因素和误差相关的各种因素和误差的影响,所述多种操作阶段考虑用于漏油的漏油准备和响应(例如,漏油泄漏发生,溢出监测,决定制作/应急计划和泄漏反应);通过模糊集理论与定量数据分析以及通过相似性与理想解决方案(模糊Topsis)的顺序优先考虑的技术,以增强响应操作期间的决策。综合人类因子分析和决策支持系统的效率与来自案例研究的数据进行了测试,以产生全面的优先级别,鲁棒敏感性分析和其他理论/实践见解。拟议的方法提高了我们对石油泄漏事故和响应业务对人为因素/误差意义的了解;并提供了改进的支持工具,用于决策。 (c)2020作者。 elsevier有限公司出版

著录项

  • 来源
    《Environmental Pollution》 |2020年第7期|114294.1-114294.9|共9页
  • 作者单位

    Mem Univ Newfoundland Fac Engn & Appl Sci Northern Reg Persistent Organ Pollut Control NRPO St John NF A1B 3X5 Canada;

    Mem Univ Newfoundland Fac Engn & Appl Sci Northern Reg Persistent Organ Pollut Control NRPO St John NF A1B 3X5 Canada|Peking Univ Coll Environm Sci & Engn Beijing 100871 Peoples R China;

    Fisheries & Oceans Canada Ecosyst Sci Ottawa ON K1A 0E6 Canada;

    Univ Calif Berkeley Ctr Catastroph Risk Management CCRM Berkeley CA 94720 USA;

    Mem Univ Newfoundland Fac Engn & Appl Sci Northern Reg Persistent Organ Pollut Control NRPO St John NF A1B 3X5 Canada;

  • 收录信息 美国《科学引文索引》(SCI);美国《工程索引》(EI);美国《生物学医学文摘》(MEDLINE);美国《化学文摘》(CA);
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

    Offshore oil spill accidents; Human factors and errors; Decision supporting system; HFACS; Fuzzy-TOPSIS;

    机译:离岸漏油事故;人类因素和错误;决策支持系统;HFACS;模糊 - TOPSIS;

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号