首页> 外文期刊>Environmental Pollution >Monitoring air quality with lichens: A comparison between mapping in forest sites and in open areas
【24h】

Monitoring air quality with lichens: A comparison between mapping in forest sites and in open areas

机译:用地衣监测空气质量:在森林场地和开阔地带进行制图的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Four different methods of epiphytic lichen mapping were used for the assessment of air quality in the region under the influence of the Sostanj Thermal Power Plant (Salek Valley, Slovenia). Three methods were based on the presence of different lichen species (VDI, EU and ICP-Forest), the fourth on a frequency and coverage assessment of different growth forms of epiphytic lichens, e.g. crustose, foliose and fruticose (SI). A comparison of the results from the assessment of air quality between forest sites (ICP-Forest, SI) and open areas (VDI, EU and SI), obtained by the different methods of epiphytic lichen mapping, is presented in the contribution. Data showed that lichen species richness is worse in forest sites in comparison with open areas. From the data obtained it can be concluded that epiphytic lichen mapping in open areas is a better method for the assessment of air pollution in a given area than mapping in forest sites. The species-based methods in open areas are more powerful and useful for air quality assessment in polluted research areas than the SI and ICP-Forest methods.
机译:在Sostanj热电厂(斯洛文尼亚Salek谷)的影响下,使用了四种不同的附生地衣作图方法来评估该地区的空气质量。三种方法基于不同地衣物种(VDI,EU和ICP-Forest)的存在,第四种方法基于附生地衣不同生长形式的频率和覆盖率评估,例如壳糖,叶糖和果糖(SI)。在贡献中,对通过不同附生地衣测绘方法获得的森林地点(ICP-Forest,SI)和开阔地区(VDI,EU和SI)之间的空气质量评估结果进行了比较。数据显示,与空旷地区相比,林地中的地衣物种丰富度更差。从获得的数据可以得出结论,在空旷地区的附生地衣测绘比在森林地点测绘是一种更好的评估给定区域空气污染的方法。与SI和ICP-Forest方法相比,在开放区域中基于物种的方法在污染研究区域的空气质量评估中更有效,更有用。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号