首页> 外文期刊>Environmental Politics >Knowledge uncertainties in environmental conflicts: how the mussel fishery controversy in the Dutch Wadden Sea became depoliticised
【24h】

Knowledge uncertainties in environmental conflicts: how the mussel fishery controversy in the Dutch Wadden Sea became depoliticised

机译:环境冲突中的知识不确定性:欧洲人在荷兰瓦登海的争议争议是如何成为代表性的

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Policy-makers and scientists often expect that controversies in public policy can be solved by gathering more knowledge, even though this linear model of expertise is widely criticised in social studies of science. To shed more light on this expectation, the role of scientific uncertainties in controversies on mussel fishery in the Dutch Wadden Sea (1990-2016) is investigated. The analysis shows that mussel fishery regulation decisions were primarily based on government authority, not on scientific knowledge. Expectations of policy-makers and scientists on conflict resolution by more research were not met, because the knowledge debate was politicised over ambiguous knowledge claims. The controversy was depoliticised by a political covenant between the conflicting parties. The case study confirms that science-based knowledge fails to guide policy-making as expected in the linear model, and demonstrates how science plays important strategic, procedural and instrumental roles in structuring interactions between stakeholders in nature protection conflicts.
机译:政策制定者和科学家们经常期望通过收集更多知识来解决公共政策的争议,即使这种线性专业知识在科学社会研究中被广泛批评。调查了对此期望的更轻,研究了科学不确定性在荷兰瓦登海(1990-2016)中贻贝渔业争议的作用。分析表明,贻贝渔业监管决策主要基于政府权威,而不是科学知识。不符合更多研究的政策制定者和科学家对政策制定者和科学家的期望,因为知识辩论是通过模糊知识索赔的政治化。争议是由冲突缔约方之间的政治约定代表。案例研究证实,基于科学的知识未能在线性模型中预期指导策略制作,并展示科学在结构性保护机构中的利益攸关方之间的相互作用方面发挥重要战略,程序和工具作用。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号