首页> 外文期刊>Environmental Politics >Policy learning or politics as usual? Explaining the rise and retrenchment of renewable electricity support policies in Europe
【24h】

Policy learning or politics as usual? Explaining the rise and retrenchment of renewable electricity support policies in Europe

机译:政策学习或政治正常?解释欧洲可再生电力支持政策的兴起和削弱

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

I assess the contribution of policy learning to changes in renewable energy support policies in the European Union (EU), focusing on the evolution of the 'Feed-in Tariff' in Germany and the United Kingdom, considering both 'endogenous' (responses to the effects of existing policy within the country) and 'exogenous' (responses based on external experience of the policy) learning in shaping the design and operation of the mechanism as policy shifted from an expansionary to a retrenchment phase. I evaluate the analytical value of a policy learning approach compared with other explanations for such policy changes, particularly those which draw upon more conventional political drivers such as political parties, interest groups and institutional conditions at the domestic and EU levels. While there are signs in both cases that policy learning has informed changes in the policy in certain respects, the principal drivers of, and constraints upon, change have been political.
机译:我评估了政策学习对欧盟(欧盟)的可再生能源支持政策变化的贡献,重点是德国和英国的“送税”的演变,考虑到“内源”(对)国家内部政策的影响)和“外源”(基于政策外部经验的回应)在塑造机制设计和运作时,作为政策从扩张性转向retrychment阶段的设计和运作。我评估了策略学习方法的分析价值与此类政策变化的其他解释相比,特别是那些在国内和欧盟各级等政党,利益集团和机构条件等更传统的政治司机。虽然两种情况都有迹象,但在这两种情况下,政策学习在某些方面的政策方面知情改变,司法司机和限制的改变是政治的。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号