首页> 外文期刊>Environmental Politics >The politics of carbon taxation: how varieties of policy style matter
【24h】

The politics of carbon taxation: how varieties of policy style matter

机译:碳税的政治:政策风格品种多么品种

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

The momentum achieved for unilateral carbon taxes in seven European countries is examined. Why is it that small countries, despite being vulnerable to forces of international competition, have been able to implement carbon taxes? A review of national experiences does not suggest that the share of fossil fuels in the energy mix defines the room for such taxes, or point to a strong role for traditional left-right ideology. Rather, it is deep-seated patterns of national policy styles with neo-corporatist traits, providing a protective device for the open economies of small countries, which condition the introduction of carbon taxes. The associated routines of decision-making offer coordination mechanisms for proactive macroeconomic policies in which carbon taxation can find a place. Parliamentary democracies with proportional representation, as is common in the smaller countries, provide access to government for political parties that pursue carbon taxation. These in turn sensitise larger political parties to climate concerns, as they benefit from institutionalised practices and routines for problem-solving and consensus-seeking.
机译:审查了七个欧洲各国在单方面碳税的势头。为什么小国家,尽管易受国际竞争力的群体,但已经能够实施碳税?对国家经验的审查并没有表明,化石燃料在能源混合中的份额定义了此类税收的房间,或指出传统左右思想的强大作用。相反,它是具有新公司性质的国家政策风格的深刻座位模式,为小国家的开放经济提供保护装置,条件引入碳税。决策的相关例程提供碳税可以找到一个地方的主动宏观经济政策的协调机制。与较小国家的常见代表团的议会民主国家(较小的国家)提供对追求碳税的政府的访问。这些反过来致力于大量的政党对气候担忧,因为它们受益于制度化的做法和案例来解决问题和寻求共定共识。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号