首页> 外文期刊>Environmental Politics >Networking in environmental movement organisation coalitions: interest, values or discourse?
【24h】

Networking in environmental movement organisation coalitions: interest, values or discourse?

机译:环境运动组织联盟中的网络:兴趣,价值还是话语权?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Networks of information and resource exchanges between social movement organisations (SMOs) have a dual function. Such networks can support instrumental alliances among very distinct and weakly connected SMOs, but they often support the formation of more tightly-knit social movement and SMO discourse coalitions. What distinguishes an instrumental from a more substantive alliance is the density of networking. The coalescing force in dense networks is not necessarily a collective identity, but the similarity in values (value homophily) or a shared discourse. Evidence from Indonesian environmental activism is used to draw three propositions on networking, value homophily and discursive practices in coalition work: networks tend to be most dense among environmental SMOs that share the same variety of environmentalism; density of interaction in SMO discourse coalitions reveals ongoing framing activities; and environmental SMO discourse coalitions bridge across SMOs with distinct yet compatible environmental values.
机译:社会运动组织(SMO)之间的信息和资源交换网络具有双重功能。这样的网络可以支持非常独特且联系不紧密的SMO之间的工具联盟,但它们通常支持更紧密联系的社会运动和SMO话语联盟的形成。与更实质性的联盟区别开来的工具是网络的密度。密集网络中的凝聚力不一定是集体身份,而是价值的相似性(价值同质)或共享的话语。来自印度尼西亚环境行动主义的证据被用来就联盟工作中的网络,价值同质和话语实践提出三个主张:网络在拥有相同环境主义多样性的环境SMO中往往是最密集的。 SMO话语联盟的互动密度揭示了正在进行的框架活动;和环境SMO话语联盟跨越了具有独特但兼容的环境价值的SMO。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号