首页> 外文期刊>European environment >EU Energy-Intensive Industries and Emission Trading: Losers Becoming Winners?
【24h】

EU Energy-Intensive Industries and Emission Trading: Losers Becoming Winners?

机译:欧盟能源密集型产业和排放交易:失败者成为赢家?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

The EU Emissions Trading System (ETS) initially treated power producers and energy-intensive industries similarly, despite clear structural differences between these industries regarding e.g. pass-through of costs. Hence, the energy-intensive industries could be seen as losing out in the internal distribution. In the January 2008 proposal for a reformed ETS post-2012, a differentiated system was proposed where the energy-intensive industries would come out relatively much better. Why is this? Although power producers still have a dominant position in the system, the increasing consensus about windfall profits has weakened their standing. Conversely, increasing attention to such profits and not least the possibility of global carbon leakage has strengthened the case of energy-intensive industries at both national and EU levels. These industries have become more active in EU processes and somewhat better organized. Finally, growing fear of lax global climate policies has strengthened the case of these industries further.
机译:欧盟排放交易系统(ETS)最初对电力生产商和能源密集型行业的处理类似,尽管这些行业之间在结构上存在明显差异,例如成本转嫁。因此,能源密集型行业可能会在内部分配中失利。在2008年1月关于2012年后ETS进行改革的提案中,提出了一种差异化的体系,其中高耗能行业的表现将相对好得多。为什么是这样?尽管电力生产商仍在系统中占据主导地位,但人们对暴利的共识不断增加,削弱了他们的地位。相反,人们越来越关注这种利润,尤其是全球碳泄漏的可能性,在国家和欧盟两级都加强了能源密集型产业的发展。这些行业在欧盟流程中变得更加活跃,组织起来也更好。最后,对全球气候政策宽松的担忧日益加剧,这些行业的情况进一步加强。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号