首页> 外文期刊>Environmental and planning law journal >Re-examining the Approach to Alternative Sentencing Orders in New South Wales Pollution Law
【24h】

Re-examining the Approach to Alternative Sentencing Orders in New South Wales Pollution Law

机译:重新审视《新南威尔士州污染法》中其他量刑顺序的方法

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

The Protection of the Environment Operations Act 1997 (NSW) (POEO Act) contains alternative sentencing orders (ASOs), such as environmental service orders, that can be imposed in addition to, or as an alternative to, a fine or imprisonment. Despite a number of ASOs existing for many years, some have not been used, while others have failed to be utilised to their full potential or have lost favour. The NSW Environment Protection Authority (EPA) guidelines regarding the use of ASOs are outdated. In contrast to the general principles of sentencing, the principles the court applies when considering ASOs are not as well-established for some orders.This article examines the use of ASOs in POEO Act prosecutions brought by the EPA in the Land and Environment Court of NSW, focusing particularly on environmental service and payment orders, publication orders and monetary benefit orders. The aim is to examine and encourage further consideration of how the use of ASOs and relevant principles can be refined in the future.
机译:《 1997年保护环境行动法》(NSW)(《 POEO法》)包含替代性判刑令(ASO),例如环境服务令,可以作为罚款或监禁的补充或替代措施。尽管已有许多ASO存在多年,但有些尚未使用,而另一些尚未充分发挥其潜力或受到青睐。新南威尔士州环境保护局(EPA)关于使用ASO的指南已过时。与判刑的一般原则相反,法院在考虑对某些命令而言ASO不太完善时适用的原则。本文研究了EPA在新南威尔士州土地和环境法院提起的POEO法案起诉中使用ASO的问题,特别关注环境服务和付款订单,发布订单和货币利益订单。目的是研究并鼓励进一步考虑将来如何改进ASO和相关原则的使用。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号