首页> 外文期刊>Environmental Monitoring and Assessment >Equitable fund allocation, an economical approach for sustainable waste load allocation
【24h】

Equitable fund allocation, an economical approach for sustainable waste load allocation

机译:公平分配资金,一种可持续分配废物的经济方法

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

This research aims to study a novel approach for waste load allocation (WLA) to meet environmental, economical, and equity objectives, simultaneously. For this purpose, based on a simulation-optimization model developed for Haraz River in north of Iran, the waste loads are allocated according to discharge permit market. The non-dominated solutions are initially achieved through multiobjective particle swarm optimization (MOPSO). Here, the violation of environmental standards based on dissolved oxygen (DO) versus biochemical oxidation demand (BOD) removal costs is minimized to find economical total maximum daily loads (TMDLs). This can save 41 % in total abatement costs in comparison with the conventional command and control policy. The BOD discharge permit market then increases the revenues to 45 %. This framework ensures that the environmental limits are fulfilled but the inequity index is rather high (about 4.65). For instance, the discharge permit buyer may not be satisfied about the equity of WLA. Consequently, it is recommended that a third party or institution should be in charge of reallocating the funds. It means that the polluters which gain benefits by unfair discharges should pay taxes (or funds) to compensate the losses of other polluters. This intends to reduce the costs below the required values of the lowest inequity index condition. These compensations of equitable fund allocation (EFA) may help to reduce the dissatisfactions and develop WLA policies. It is concluded that EFA in integration with water quality trading (WQT) is a promising approach to meet the objectives.
机译:这项研究旨在研究一种新颖的废物分配方法(WLA),以同时满足环境,经济和公平目标。为此,根据为伊朗北部哈拉兹河开发的模拟优化模型,根据排放许可市场分配废物负荷。最初,非控制解决方案是通过多目标粒子群优化(MOPSO)来实现的。在这里,基于溶解氧(DO)与生化氧化需求(BOD)去除成本的环境标准违规被最小化,以找到经济的总最大日负荷(TMDL)。与传统的命令和控制策略相比,这可以节省41%的总减排成本。 BOD排放许可证市场随后将收入增加到45%。该框架确保满足环境限制,但是不平等指数很高(约4.65)。例如,排放许可证购买者可能对WLA的权益不满意。因此,建议由第三方或机构负责重新分配资金。这意味着通过不公平排放获得利益的污染者应纳税(或支付资金)以补偿其他污染者的损失。这旨在将成本降低到最低不平等指数条件的要求值以下。这些对公平资金分配(EFA)的补偿可能有助于减少不满并制定WLA政策。结论是,将全民教育与水质贸易(WQT)相结合是实现目标的一种有前途的方法。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号