首页> 外文期刊>Environmental Modelling & Software >Evaluation of modelling techniques for forest site productivity prediction in contrasting ecoregions using stochastic multicriteria acceptability analysis (SMAA)
【24h】

Evaluation of modelling techniques for forest site productivity prediction in contrasting ecoregions using stochastic multicriteria acceptability analysis (SMAA)

机译:使用随机多准则可接受性分析(SMAA)评估生态区域对比中林地生产力预测的建模技术

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Accurate estimation of site productivity is crucial for sustainable forest resource management. In recent years, a variety of modelling approaches have been developed and applied to predict site index from a wide range of environmental variables, with varying success. The selection, application and comparison of suitable modelling techniques remains therefore a meticulous task, subject to ongoing research and debate. In this study, the performance of five modelling techniques was compared for the prediction of forest site index in two contrasting ecoregions: the temperate lowland of Flanders, Belgium, and the Mediterranean mountains in SW Turkey. The modelling techniques include statistical (multiple linear regression - MLR, classification and regression trees - CART, generalized additive models - GAM), as well as machine-learning (artificial neural networks - ANN) and hybrid techniques (boosted regression trees - BRT). Although the selected predictor variables differed largely, with mainly topographic predictor variables in the mountain area versus soil and humus variables in the lowland area, the techniques performed comparatively similar in both ecoregions. Stochastic multicriteria acceptability analysis (SMAA) was found a well-suited multicriteria evaluation method to evaluate the performance of the modelling techniques. It has been applied on the individual species models of Flanders, as well as a species-independent evaluation, combining all developed models from the two contrasting ecoregions. We came to the conclusion that non-parametric models are better suited for predicting site index than traditional MLR. GAM and BRT are the preferred alternatives for a wide range of weight preferences. CART is preferred when very high weight is given to user-friendliness, whereas ANN is recommended when most weight is given to pure predictive performance.
机译:准确估算场地生产力对于可持续森林资源管理至关重要。近年来,已开发出多种建模方法并将其用于根据各种环境变量来预测站点索引,并且取得了不同的成功。因此,适当建模技术的选择,应用和比较仍然是一项细致的任务,有待进行不断的研究和辩论。在这项研究中,比较了五种建模技术的性能,以预测两个截然不同的生态区域的森林站点指数:佛兰德斯的温带低地,比利时和土耳其西南部的地中海山脉。建模技术包括统计(多元线性回归-MLR,分类和回归树-CART,广义加性模型-GAM)以及机器学习(人工神经网络-ANN)和混合技术(增强回归树-BRT)。尽管所选的预测变量差异很大,主要是山区的地形预测变量与低地的土壤和腐殖质变量,但在两个生态区中,这些技术的表现相对相似。随机多标准可接受性分析(SMAA)是一种非常适合的多标准评估方法,用于评估建模技术的性能。它已被用于法兰德斯的单个物种模型以及与物种无关的评估,结合了来自两个不同生态区域的所有已开发模型。我们得出的结论是,非参数模型比传统的MLR更适合于预测站点索引。 GAM和BRT是各种重量偏好的首选替代品。当对用户友好性给予非常高的权重时,首选CART;而当对纯预测性能给予最大权重时,建议使用ANN。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Environmental Modelling & Software》 |2011年第7期|p.929-937|共9页
  • 作者单位

    Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences, Division Forest, Nature and Landscape, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Celestijnenlaan 200E Box 2411, BE-3001 Leuven, Belgium;

    Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences, Division Forest, Nature and Landscape, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Celestijnenlaan 200E Box 2411, BE-3001 Leuven, Belgium;

    Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences, Division Forest, Nature and Landscape, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Celestijnenlaan 200E Box 2411, BE-3001 Leuven, Belgium;

    Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences, Division Forest, Nature and Landscape, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Celestijnenlaan 200E Box 2411, BE-3001 Leuven, Belgium;

  • 收录信息 美国《科学引文索引》(SCI);美国《工程索引》(EI);
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

    mediterranean mountain forest; temperate lowland forest; predictive modelling; boosted regression trees; artificial neural networks; generalized additive models; site index;

    机译:地中海山林温带低地森林;预测建模;增强回归树;人工神经网络;广义加性模型;网站索引;

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号