首页> 外文期刊>Environmental Modelling & Software >Evaluating Shuttle radar and interpolated DEMs for slope gradient and soil erosion estimation in low relief terrain
【24h】

Evaluating Shuttle radar and interpolated DEMs for slope gradient and soil erosion estimation in low relief terrain

机译:评估航天飞机雷达和内插DEM在低起伏地形中的坡度和土壤侵蚀估计

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The error in slope gradient estimates provided by digital elevation models propagates to spatial modelling of erosion and other environmental attributes, potentially impacting land management priorities. This study compared the slope estimates of Shuttle Radar Topographic Mission (SRTM) DEMs with those generated by interpolation of topographic contours, at two grid cell resolutions. The magnitude and spatial patterns of error in DEM slope, and derived erosion estimates using the Revised Universal Soil Loss Equation (RUSLE), were evaluated at three sites in eastern Australia. The sites have low-relief terrain and slope gradients less than 15%, characteristics which dominate the global land surface by area and are often highly utilised. Relative to a reference DEM resampled to the same resolution (a measure of DEM 'quality'), the 90 m (3-s) SRTM DEM provided the best estimates of slopes, being within 20% for each 5% slope class outside alluvial floodplains where it over-predicted by up to 220%. Relative to a hillslope scale 10 m reference DEM, the 30 m (1-s) SRTM-derived DEM-S, provided slope gradient estimates slightly less biased towards under-prediction than the 90 m SRTM and significantly less biased on alluvial floodplains. In contrast, the 20 m vertical contour intervals underpinning the interpolated DEMs resulted in under-prediction of slope gradient by more than a factor of 5 over large contiguous areas (>1 km~2). The 30 m DEM-S product provided the best estimate of hillslope erosion, being 3-4% better than the 90 m SRTM. The slope errors in the interpolated DEMs translated into generally poorer and less consistent erosion estimates than SRTM. From this study it is concluded that the SRTM DEM products, in particular the 30 m SRTM-derived DEM-S, provide estimates of slope gradient and erosion which are more accurate, and more consistent within and between low relief study sites, than interpolated DEMs.
机译:数字高程模型提供的坡度梯度估计值的误差会传播到侵蚀和其他环境属性的空间模型,从而可能影响土地管理的优先级。这项研究将航天飞机雷达地形任务(SRTM)DEM的斜率估算值与在两个网格单元分辨率下通过地形轮廓线插值生成的斜率估算值进行了比较。在澳大利亚东部的三个地点评估了DEM坡度误差的大小和空间模式,以及使用修订的通用土壤流失方程(RUSLE)得出的侵蚀估计值。这些场地的起伏地势低,坡度梯度小于15%,这些特征占据了全球陆地面积的主导地位,并且经常被高度利用。相对于以相同分辨率重新采样的参考DEM(DEM“质量”的度量),90 m(3-s)SRTM DEM提供了最佳的坡度估算,在冲积平原以外每5%的坡度等级在20%以内它被高估了多达220%。相对于10 m参考DEM的山坡标度,由30 m(1-s)SRTM衍生的DEM-S提供的坡度梯度估计值比90 m SRTM偏向预测不足的偏向略小,而对冲积洪泛区的偏倚则明显较小。相比之下,内插DEM支撑的20 m垂直轮廓间隔导致大连续区域(> 1 km〜2)的坡度预测不足5倍。 30 m DEM-S产品提供了最佳的坡度侵蚀估算,比90 m SRTM高出3-4%。与SRTM相比,内插DEM中的坡度误差通常会转化为更差且不一致的侵蚀估算。从这项研究得出的结论是,SRTM DEM产品(特别是30 m SRTM衍生的DEM-S)提供了坡度梯度和侵蚀的估计值,与内插DEM相比,它们在低起伏研究站点内和之间更准确,更一致。 。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号