首页> 外文期刊>Environmental Modeling & Assessment >Harvesting Freely Roaming Public Resources: Can Property Owners Harvest Kangaroos Utilizing Their Land Without Impacting Neighbors?
【24h】

Harvesting Freely Roaming Public Resources: Can Property Owners Harvest Kangaroos Utilizing Their Land Without Impacting Neighbors?

机译:收获自由漫游的公共资源:业主可以在不影响邻居的情况下收获利用土地的袋鼠吗?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

In Australian semiarid rangelands, there have been suggestions that kangaroo harvesting should be given much more serious consideration as a supplement or even replacement to income from domestic stock like cattle and sheep. The possibility of kangaroo harvesting ever being economically viable, however, is often dismissed due to the impossibility of constraining these freely roaming animals to a particular property. In this paper, we explore the extent to which landholders do have control of their harvests regardless of the activities on neighboring land. Three scenarios are investigated: a property with a porous border that is surrounded by a reserve, like a national park, that is much larger and where harvesting is prohibited; a pair of properties with porous borders where harvesting is permitted and landholders act cooperatively; and finally two properties with porous borders where harvesting is permitted and landholders act competitively. The results indicate that despite the freely roaming nature of kangaroos, private property owners can obtain harvests proportional to the extent to which their land and grazing resources are utilized.
机译:在澳大利亚的半干旱牧场,有人建议应更加认真地考虑袋鼠的收获,以补充或什至替代牛,羊等家畜的收入。然而,由于不可能将这些自由漫游的动物限制在特定的财产上,因此袋鼠收割永远在经济上可行的可能性经常被忽略。在本文中,我们探讨了不管邻近土地上的活动如何,土地所有者对他们的收获进行控制的程度。研究了以下三种情况:边界多孔的财产被保护区所包围,例如国家公园,该保护区更大且禁止收获;一对具有多孔边界的财产,允许收获,土地所有者共同行动;最后是边界允许的两个具有多孔边界的土地,允许采伐并且土地所有者具有竞争性。结果表明,尽管袋鼠具有自由漫游的性质,但私有财产所有者仍可以根据其土地和放牧资源的利用程度获得相应的收成。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号