首页> 外文期刊>Environmental Management >Incorporating Carbon Storage into the Optimal Management of Forest Insect Pests: A Case Study of the Southern Pine Beetle (Dendroctonus Frontalis Zimmerman) in the New Jersey Pinelands
【24h】

Incorporating Carbon Storage into the Optimal Management of Forest Insect Pests: A Case Study of the Southern Pine Beetle (Dendroctonus Frontalis Zimmerman) in the New Jersey Pinelands

机译:将碳存储纳入森林害虫的最佳管理中:以新泽西州松树地区的南部松甲虫(Dendroctonus Frontalis Zimmerman)为例

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Forest insect pest disturbance is increasing in certain areas of North America as many insect species, such as the southern pine beetle, expand their range due to a warming climate. Because insect pests are beginning to occupy forests that are managed for multiple uses and have not been managed for pests before, it is becoming increasingly important to determine how forests should be managed for pests when non-timber ecosystem services are considered in addition to traditional costs and revenues. One example of a service that is increasingly considered in forest management and that may affect forest pest management is carbon sequestration. This manuscript seeks to understand whether the incorporation of forest carbon sequestration into cost-benefit analysis of different forest pest management strategies affects the financially optimal strategy. We examine this question through a case study of the southern pine beetle (SPB) in a new area of SPB expansion, the New Jersey Pinelands National Reserve (NJPR). We utilize a forest ecology and economics model and include field data from the NJPR as well as outbreak probability statistics from previous years. We find under the majority of scenarios, incorporating forest carbon sequestration shifts the financially optimal SPB management strategy from preventative thinning toward no management or reactionary management in forest stands in New Jersey. These results contradict the current recommended treatment strategy for SPB and signify that the inclusion of multiple ecosystem services into a cost-benefit analysis may drastically alter which pest management strategy is economically optimal.
机译:由于气候变暖,北美某些地区的森林昆虫有害生物干扰在增加,例如南方松甲虫等许多昆虫种类扩大了它们的范围。由于虫害开始占据了经过多种用途管理且以前从未对其进行过害虫管理的森林,因此,除了传统成本外,确定当考虑非木材生态系统服务时,如何管理森林中的害虫就变得越来越重要。和收入。碳固存是在森林管理中越来越多地考虑并可能影响森林有害生物管理的一项服务。该手稿试图了解将森林固碳纳入不同森林有害生物管理策略的成本效益分析是否会影响财务上的最佳策略。我们通过在SPB扩展的新区域,新泽西州松树国家保护区(NJPR)中的南部松甲虫(SPB)的案例研究来研究这个问题。我们利用森林生态学和经济学模型,包括来自新泽西州自然保护区的实地数据以及前几年的爆发概率统计数据。我们发现,在大多数情况下,合并森林碳汇将使财务上最佳的SPB管理策略从预防性变薄转向新泽西州林分无管理或反动管理。这些结果与当前推荐的SPB的处理策略相矛盾,并表明在成本效益分析中包含多种生态系统服务可能会极大地改变哪种有害生物管理策略在经济上是最佳的。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Environmental Management》 |2014年第4期|875-887|共13页
  • 作者单位

    Department of Environmental Studies, Environmental Studies Program, Dartmouth College, 6182 Steele Hall, Hanover, NH 03755, USA;

    Department of Environmental Studies, Environmental Studies Program, Dartmouth College, 6182 Steele Hall, Hanover, NH 03755, USA;

    Department of Environmental Studies, Environmental Studies Program, Dartmouth College, 6182 Steele Hall, Hanover, NH 03755, USA;

  • 收录信息 美国《科学引文索引》(SCI);美国《工程索引》(EI);美国《化学文摘》(CA);
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

    Forest pest management; Southern pine beetle; Carbon sequestration; Forest thinning;

    机译:森林虫害管理;南方松甲虫;碳汇;森林间伐;
  • 入库时间 2022-08-17 13:27:05

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号