首页> 外文期刊>Environmental Management >Convergent and Contingent Community Responses to Grass Source and Dominance During Prairie Restoration Across a Longitudinal Gradient
【24h】

Convergent and Contingent Community Responses to Grass Source and Dominance During Prairie Restoration Across a Longitudinal Gradient

机译:跨纵向梯度的草原恢复过程中社区对草源和优势的趋同性和偶然性响应

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Restoring prairie on formerly cultivated land begins by selecting propagule seed sources and the diversity of species to reintroduce. This study examined the effects of dominant grass propagule source (cultivar vs. non-cultivar) and sown propagule diversity (grass:forb sowing ratio) on plant community structure. Two field experiments were established in Kansas and Illinois consisting of identical split plot designs. Dominant grass source was assigned as the whole-plot factor, and sown dominance of grasses (five levels of seeded grass dominance) as the subplot factor. Species density, cover, and diversity were quantified for 5 years. The effect of dominant grass source on the cover of focal grasses, sown species, and volunteer species was contingent upon location, with variation between dominant grass sources observed exclusively in Kansas. Species density and diversity showed regionally convergent patterns in response to dominant grass source. Contrary to our hypotheses, total species density and diversity were not lower in the presence of grass cultivars, the grass source we had predicted would be more competitive. Sown grass dominance effects on the cover of the focal grass species were contingent upon location resulting from establishment corresponding better to the assigned treatments in Illinois. All other cover groups showed regionally convergent patterns, with lower cover of volunteers and higher cover of sown forbs, diversity, and species density in the lowest sown grass dominance treatment in both sites. Thus, decisions regarding the diversity of propagules to reintroduce had more consequence for plant community structure than cultivar or non-cultivar source of dominant grasses.
机译:要在原耕地上恢复草原,首先要选择繁殖种子的来源和重新引入的物种多样性。这项研究研究了优势草繁殖体来源(栽培品种与非栽培品种)和播种繁殖体多样性(草:草播种率)对植物群落结构的影响。在堪萨斯州和伊利诺伊州建立了两个野外实验,其中包括相同的分割图设计。将主要草源指定为整体图因子,将草的播种优势(播种草的五个级别)作为子图因子。对物种密度,覆盖率和多样性进行了为期5年的量化。优势草源对焦点草,播种和志愿树种的覆盖效果取决于位置,在堪萨斯州仅观察到优势草源之间存在差异。物种密度和多样性表现出对主要草源的响应的区域收敛模式。与我们的假设相反,在存在草品种的情况下,总物种密度和多样性并不低,我们之前预测的草来源将更具竞争力。播种草对局灶性草种的优势作用取决于地点的建立,其位置与伊利诺伊州的指定处理方法相对较好。所有其他覆盖组均表现出区域收敛的模式,在两个地点播种草率最低的处理中,志愿者的覆盖率较低,播种的草覆盖率,多样性和物种密度较高。因此,有关繁殖体再引入多样性的决定对植物群落结构的影响要大于优势草的栽培品种或非栽培品种来源。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Environmental Management》 |2014年第2期|252-265|共14页
  • 作者单位

    Department of Plant Biology and Center for Ecology, Southern Illinois University, Carbondale, IL 62901-6509, USA, 5162 Valleypointe Parkway, Roanoke, VA 24019, USA;

    Department of Plant Biology and Center for Ecology, Southern Illinois University, Carbondale, IL 62901-6509, USA;

    Department of Plant Biology and Center for Ecology, Southern Illinois University, Carbondale, IL 62901-6509, USA;

  • 收录信息 美国《科学引文索引》(SCI);美国《工程索引》(EI);美国《化学文摘》(CA);
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

    Restoration; Grassland; Ecotype; Seed source;

    机译:恢复;草原;生态型种子来源;
  • 入库时间 2022-08-17 13:27:00

相似文献

  • 外文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号