首页> 外文期刊>Environmental Management >Conservation Tillage Affects Species Composition But Not Species Diversity: A Comparative Study in Northern Italy
【24h】

Conservation Tillage Affects Species Composition But Not Species Diversity: A Comparative Study in Northern Italy

机译:保护性耕作影响物种组成但不影响物种多样性:意大利北部的比较研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Conservation tillage (CT) is widely considered to be a practice aimed at preserving several ecosystem functions. In the literature, however, there seems to be no clear pattern with regard to its benefits on species diversity and species composition. In Northern Italy, we compared species composition and diversity of both vascular plants and Carabids under two contrasting tillage systems, i.e., CT and conventional tillage, respectively. We hypothesized a significant positive impact of CT on both species diversity and composition. We also considered the potential influence of crop type. The tillage systems were studied under open field conditions with three-types of annual crops (i.e., maize, soybean, and winter cereals), using a split-plot design on pairs of adjacent fields. Linear mixed models were applied to test tillage system, crop, and interaction effects on diversity indices. Plant and Carabids communities were analyzed by multivariate methods (CCA). On the whole, 136 plant and 51 carabid taxa were recorded. The two tillage systems studied did not differ in floristic or carabid diversity. Species composition, by contrast, proved to be characteristic for each combination of tillage system and crop type. In particular, CT fields were characterized by nutrient demanding weeds and the associated Carabids. The differences were especially pronounced in fields with winter cereals. The same was true for the flora and Carabids along the field boundaries. For studying the effects of CT practices on the sustainability of agro-ecosystems, therefore, the focus should be on species composition rather than on diversity measures.
机译:保护性耕作(CT)被广泛认为是一种旨在维护多种生态系统功能的做法。但是,在文献中,关于其对物种多样性和物种组成的好处似乎没有明确的模式。在意大利北部,我们比较了两种对比耕作系统(分别为CT和常规耕作)下维管植物和Carabids的物种组成和多样性。我们假设CT对物种多样性和组成具有重大的积极影响。我们还考虑了作物类型的潜在影响。在开放田地条件下,使用成对分裂田地设计成对的耕作系统,研究了三种类型的一年生作物(即玉米,大豆和冬季谷物)。线性混合模型用于测试耕作系统,农作物以及相互作用对多样性指数的影响。通过多变量方法(CCA)分析了植物群落和锁甲群落。总体上,记录了136种植物和51种Carabid类群。所研究的两种耕作系统在植物区系或Caraband多样性方面没有差异。相比之下,物种组成被证明是耕作系统和作物类型的每种组合的特征。特别是,CT田地的特点是需要养分的杂草和伴生的甲节。在冬季谷物的田间差异尤为明显。沿田间边界的植物区系和锁甲也是如此。因此,在研究CT做法对农业生态系统可持续性的影响时,重点应放在物种构成而不是多样性措施上。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Environmental Management》 |2015年第2期|443-452|共10页
  • 作者单位

    Department of Agriculture and Environmental Sciences, University of Udine, Via delle Scienze 208, 33100 Udine, Italy,Zurich University of Applied Science ZHAW, Schloss, 8820 Waedenswil, Switzerland;

    Department of Agriculture and Environmental Sciences, University of Udine, Via delle Scienze 208, 33100 Udine, Italy;

    Department of Agriculture and Environmental Sciences, University of Udine, Via delle Scienze 208, 33100 Udine, Italy;

    Department of Economy, University of Genova, Via Vivaldi 5, 16126 Genoa, Italy;

    Zurich University of Applied Science ZHAW, Schloss, 8820 Waedenswil, Switzerland;

    Department of Agriculture and Environmental Sciences, University of Udine, Via delle Scienze 208, 33100 Udine, Italy;

  • 收录信息 美国《科学引文索引》(SCI);美国《工程索引》(EI);美国《化学文摘》(CA);
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

    Agro-ecosystem sustainability; Biodiversity assessment; Soil conservation farming; Biocoenosis characterization;

    机译:农业生态系统的可持续性;生物多样性评估;水土保持耕作;生物群落特征;
  • 入库时间 2022-08-17 13:26:24

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号