首页> 外文期刊>Environmental Management >Ecological Knowledge Among Communities, Managers and Scientists: Bridging Divergent Perspectives to Improve Forest Management Outcomes
【24h】

Ecological Knowledge Among Communities, Managers and Scientists: Bridging Divergent Perspectives to Improve Forest Management Outcomes

机译:社区,管理者和科学家之间的生态知识:弥合不同观点,以改善森林管理成果

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Multiple actors are typically involved in forest management, namely communities, managers and researchers. In such cases, suboptimal management outcomes may, in addition to other factors, be symptomatic of a divergence in perspectives among these actors driven by fundamental differences in ecological knowledge. We examine the degree of congruence between the understandings of actors surrounding key issues of management concern in three case studies from tropical, subtropical and boreal forests. We identify commonly encountered points of divergence in ecological knowledge relating to key management processes and issues. We use these to formulate seven hypotheses about differences in the bodies of knowledge that frequently underlie communication and learning failures in forest management contexts where multiple actors are involved and outcomes are judged to be suboptimal. Finally, we present a set of propositions to acknowledge and narrow these differences. A more complete recognition of the full triangulation between all actors involved, and of the influence that fundamental differences in ecological knowledge can exert, may help lead to a more fruitful integration between local knowledge and practice, manager knowledge and practice, and contemporary science in forest management.
机译:森林经营通常涉及多个参与者,即社区,管理者和研究人员。在这种情况下,除其他因素外,次优的管理成果可能是由生态知识的根本差异所驱动的这些行为者之间观点分歧的征兆。在来自热带,亚热带和北方森林的三个案例研究中,我们研究了参与者对管理关键问题的理解之间的一致性程度。我们确定了与关键管理流程和问题相关的生态知识上经常遇到的分歧点。我们使用这些公式来制定关于知识体系差异的七个假设,这些知识差异常常是森林管理环境中沟通和学习失败的根源,其中涉及多个参与者,并且结果被认为不是最佳的。最后,我们提出了一组主张来确认和缩小这些差异。更全面地认识到所有参与方之间的全面三角关系,以及生态知识的根本差异可能产生的影响,可能有助于导致地方知识与实践,管理者知识与实践以及森林现代科学之间更加富有成果的整合。管理。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Environmental Management》 |2016年第4期|798-813|共16页
  • 作者单位

    Department of Forest Ecology and Management, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, 90183 Umea, Sweden;

    Department of Environmental Science, Rhodes University, Grahamstown 6140, South Africa;

    Resilience and Adaptation Program, University of Alaska Fairbanks, Fairbanks, AK 99775, USA;

    Institute of Arctic Biology, University of Alaska Fairbanks, Fairbanks, AK 99775, USA;

    Ashoka Trust for Research Ecology and the Environment, Royal Enclave, Sriramapura, Jakkur Post, Bangalore 560064, India;

    Ashoka Trust for Research Ecology and the Environment, Royal Enclave, Sriramapura, Jakkur Post, Bangalore 560064, India;

    Ashoka Trust for Research Ecology and the Environment, Royal Enclave, Sriramapura, Jakkur Post, Bangalore 560064, India;

    Ashoka Trust for Research Ecology and the Environment, Royal Enclave, Sriramapura, Jakkur Post, Bangalore 560064, India,Department of Crop Physiology, University of Agricultural Sciences, Bangalore 560056, India;

  • 收录信息 美国《科学引文索引》(SCI);美国《工程索引》(EI);美国《化学文摘》(CA);
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

    Communication; Conflict; Values; Local knowledge; Participation; Traditional knowledge;

    机译:通讯;冲突;价值观;当地知识;参与;传统知识;
  • 入库时间 2022-08-17 13:25:53

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号