首页> 外文期刊>Environmental Management >Does Riparian Fencing Protect Stream Water Quality in Cattle-Grazed Lands?
【24h】

Does Riparian Fencing Protect Stream Water Quality in Cattle-Grazed Lands?

机译:河岸击剑是否在牛群地上保护流水质?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Cattle degrade streams by increasing sediment, nutrient, and fecal bacteria levels. Riparian fencing is one best management practice that may protect water quality within many grazed lands. Here we surveyed the literature and summarized the responses of sediment, nutrient, and fecal indicator bacteria levels to riparian exclosure fencing in cattle-grazed lands. Overall, our review of relevant literature supports the role of riparian exclosure fencing in reducing the negative impact of cattle on water quality, particularly for sediment and fecal indicator bacteria in temperate forest and temperate grassland streams. Establishing buffer widths > 5-10 m appears to increase the likelihood of water quality improvements. Fencing may also be effective at reducing pollutant inputs during stormflows. Our survey also identified critical spatial and thematic gaps that future research programs should address. Despite cattle grazing being prevalent in 12 terrestrial biomes, our systematic search of the empirical literature identified 26 relevant studies across only three biomes. Regions with the greatest cattle populations remain largely unstudied. In addition, we identified inconsistencies in how studies reported information on regional factors, cattle management, and other metrics related to study results. We provide a list of standard parameters for future studies to consider reporting to improve cross-study comparisons of riparian fencing impacts. We also encourage future studies in semi-arid and tropical regions where cattle grazing is common.
机译:牛通过增加沉积物,营养和粪便细菌水平来降解流。河岸击剑是一个最好的管理实践,可以保护许多放牧的土地内的水质。在这里,我们调查了文献,并总结了沉积物,营养和粪便指标细菌水平对牛肉放置在牛群地区的抗静物的反应。总体而言,我们对相关文献的审查支持河岸的吸收击剑在降低牛对水质的负面影响,特别是在温带森林和温带草原溪流中的沉积物和粪便指标细菌。建立缓冲宽度> 5-10米似乎增加了水质改善的可能性。击剑也可能有效地减少风暴流出的污染物投入。我们的调查还确定了未来的研究计划应该解决的关键空间和专题差距。尽管养牛在12个陆地生物群中普遍存在,但我们对实证文献的系统搜索鉴定了26种相关研究,只有三种生物群。牛群最大的地区仍然很大程度上是不孤立的。此外,我们确定如何研究如何报告关于区域因素,牛管理和与研究结果相关的其他指标信息的信息。我们提供了一个标准参数的列表,以便将来的研究考虑报告,以改善河岸围栏影响的交叉研究比较。我们还鼓励在半干旱和热带地区进行未来的研究,其中牛放牧是常见的。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Environmental Management》 |2020年第1期|121-135|共15页
  • 作者单位

    Department of Geography Miami University Oxford OH USA;

    Office of Research and Development National Exposure Research Laboratory US Environmental Protection Agency Cincinnati OH USA;

    Division of Biology Kansas State University Manhattan KS USA;

  • 收录信息 美国《科学引文索引》(SCI);美国《工程索引》(EI);美国《化学文摘》(CA);
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

    Grazing; Water quality; Exclosure fencing; Sediment; Nutrient; Fecal;

    机译:放牧;水质;容纳击剑;沉淀;养分;粪便;

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号