首页> 外文期刊>Environmental Management >Compliance with Canada's Fisheries Act A Field Audit of Habitat Compensation Projects
【24h】

Compliance with Canada's Fisheries Act A Field Audit of Habitat Compensation Projects

机译:遵守加拿大《渔业法》人居补偿项目的现场审计

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Loss of fish habitat in North America has occurred at an unprecedented rate through the last century. In response, the Canadian Parliament enacted the habitat provisions of the Fisheries Act. Under these provisions, a "harmful alteration, disruption, or destruction to fish habitat" (HADD) cannot occur unless authorised by Fisheries and Oceans Canada (DFO), with legally binding compensatory habitat to offset the HADD. The guiding principle to DFO's conservation goal is "no net loss of the productive capacity of fish habitats" (NNL). However, performance in achieving NNL has never been evaluated on a national scale. We investigated 52 habitat compensation projects acrossrnCanada to determine compliance with physical, biological, and chemical requirements of Section 35(2) Fisheries Act authorisations. Biological requirements had the lowest compliance (58%) and chemical requirements the highest (100%). Compliance with biological requirements differed among habitat categories and was poorest (19% compliance) in riparian habitats. Approximately 86% of authorisations had larger HADD and/or smaller compensation areas than authorised. The largest noncompliance in terms of habitat area occurred in riverine habitat in which HADDs were, on average, 343% larger than initially authorised. In total, 67% of compensation projects resulted in net losses of habitat area, 2% resulted in no net loss, and 31% achieved a net gain in habitat area. Interestingly, probable violations of the Fisheries Act were prevalent at half of the projects. Analyses indicated that the frequency of probable Fisheries Act violations differed among provinces. Habitat compensation to achieve NNL, as currently implemented in Canada, is at best only slowing the rate of habitat loss. In all likelihood, increasing the amount of authorised compensatory habitat in the absence of institutional changes will not reverse this trend. Improvements in monitoring and enforcement are necessary to move towards achieving Canada's conservation goals.
机译:上个世纪以来,北美鱼类栖息地的丧失以前所未有的速度发生。作为回应,加拿大议会颁布了《渔业法》中的栖息地规定。根据这些规定,除非获得加拿大渔业和海洋部(DFO)的授权,并且具有法律约束力的补偿性栖息地来抵消HADD,否则“对鱼类栖息地的有害改变,破坏或破坏”是不可能发生的。 DFO保护目标的指导原则是“鱼类生境的生产能力没有净损失”(NNL)。但是,从未在全国范围内评估实现NNL的绩效。我们调查了整个加拿大的52个栖息地补偿项目,以确定是否符合《渔业法》第35(2)条授权的物理,生物和化学要求。生物要求的依从性最低(58%),化学要求最高(100%)。在生境类别中,对生物要求的依从性有所不同,在河岸生境中最差(依从性为19%)。大约86%的授权具有比授权更大的HADD和/或较小的赔偿范围。就栖息地面积而言,最大的不合规现象发生在河流生境中,其HADDs平均比最初批准的高出343%。总计有67%的补偿项目导致栖息地面积净损失,2%的损失没有净损失,31%的栖息地面积获得净收益。有趣的是,可能有违反《渔业法》的行为在一半的项目中普遍存在。分析表明,各省之间可能违反《渔业法》的频率有所不同。如加拿大目前所实行的,为实现NNL而进行的生境补偿充其量只能减缓生境丧失的速度。在没有体制变化的情况下增加授权补偿性栖息地的数量极有可能不会扭转这一趋势。为了实现加拿大的保护目标,有必要改善监测和执法。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号