首页> 外文期刊>Environmental law >THE CHALLENGES OF DAM REMOVAL: THE HISTORY AND LESSONS OF THE CONDIT DAM AND POTENTIAL THREATS FROM THE 2005 FEDERAL POWER ACT AMENDMENTS
【24h】

THE CHALLENGES OF DAM REMOVAL: THE HISTORY AND LESSONS OF THE CONDIT DAM AND POTENTIAL THREATS FROM THE 2005 FEDERAL POWER ACT AMENDMENTS

机译:大坝拆除的挑战:2005年联邦权力法修正案中大坝的历史,教训和潜在威胁

获取原文
           

摘要

Washington's Condit Dam is an important symbol in the struggle over the past two decades to restore fish passage past federally-licensed hydropower dams. Condit's history shows how provisions of the Federal Power Act that allow federal fish management agencies to impose Gshway prescriptions on dam relicensing can lead to the outright removal of a project that is uneconomical to operate with the necessary fish passage. The Condit Dam experience also illustrates the complexity of the decommissioning process, which requires the approval of a host of federal, state, and, potentially, local regulatory agencies before a dam can be removed. For successful dam removal, it underscores the importance of leaving no governmental parties out of the settlement process, as the counties which Condit Dam straddles have vigorously opposed the dam's removal and have threatened litigation that may further delay its decommissioning. The 2005 amendments to the Federal Power Act will complicate future efforts to remove dams and to condition hydropower project relicensing on assured fish passage. This Article describes the new procedural rights which the 2005 Federal Power Act amendments grant to utilities which oppose fish passage at dams, and how early challenges to the federal agencies' fish way prescriptions may play out. The new regulations are procedurally burdensome for parties which advocate fish passage and will certainly lead to longer and more costiy relicensing processes for many dams. However, the substantive standard in the amendments and regulations—that any alternative fish way prescription a utility proposes be no less protective than that proposed by the federal fish manager—should allow the agencies to prevail if they defend their prescriptions in the new administrative process. As a result, the new amendments will not prove to be an insurmountable barrier to future efforts to restore fish passage at, or to remove, federally-licensed dams.
机译:华盛顿的康迪特水坝(Condit Dam)是过去二十年来为恢复鱼类通过联邦许可的水坝而进行的斗争的重要标志。康迪特(Condit)的历史表明,《联邦电力法》​​(Federal Power Act)的规定如何允许联邦鱼类管理机构在大坝再许可上强加Gshway处方,从而导致彻底取消对通过必要的鱼类通道进行操作不经济的项目。 Condit大坝的经验也说明了退役过程的复杂性,在拆除大坝之前,这需要大量联邦,州以及地方监管机构的批准。对于成功拆除大坝,它强调了不让任何政府机构退出定居过程的重要性,因为康迪特大坝跨界的县大力反对拆除大坝,并威胁要提起诉讼,这可能进一步推迟其退役。 2005年对《联邦电力法》​​的修订将使未来的拆除水坝和确定有保证的鱼通过的水电项目许可的工作更加复杂。本文介绍了2005年《联邦电力法》​​修正案授予反对水坝中鱼类通过的公用事业的新程序权利,以及对联邦机构的鱼类方式规定的早期挑战可能如何发挥作用。对于提倡鱼类通过的各方,新规程在程序上是繁重的工作,肯定会导致许多大坝的许可过程更长且成本更高。但是,修正案和法规中的实质性标准(公用事业公司提出的任何替代鱼道处方所提出的保护措施均不亚于联邦鱼类管理者提出的保护措施),应允许各机构在新的行政程序中捍卫自己的处方时占上风。结果,新的修正案不会成为阻碍未来恢复在联邦许可的大坝上鱼类通过或拆除的工作的不可逾越的障碍。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号