首页> 外文期刊>Environmental law >A Train Without Tracks: Rethinking The Place Oflaw And Goals In Environmental And Natural resources Law
【24h】

A Train Without Tracks: Rethinking The Place Oflaw And Goals In Environmental And Natural resources Law

机译:一列没有轨道的火车:重新思考环境和自然资源法中法律和目标的位置

获取原文
       

摘要

As a critical mass of scholars in environmental and natural resources law respond to the work of both scientists and new governance writers, increasing emphasis has been placed on designing institutions that are flexible, capable of adapting in response to new information, and nonhierarchical. The institutional models that emerge from this thinking, however, pay limited attention to the role of goals and substantive law, instead relying on process and procedural law to achieve better environmental outcomes. This Article suggests that this is a mistake, arguing that long-term environmental protection can only be achieved by these new models if we can be sure that all of the values that are at stake in environmental protection will be adequately represented by the procedural institutions. The Article challenges whether this is possible under the current implementation of the models. It further argues that the goal of long-term environmental protection can be better achieved by bringing back a role for substantive law in the design of our institutions for environmental protection, supplementing the models.
机译:随着越来越多的环境和自然资源法律学者对科学家和新的治理作家的工作做出回应,越来越多的重点放在设计灵活的,能够适应新信息的适应性研究机构上。然而,从这种思想中产生的制度模型很少关注目标和实体法的作用,而是依靠过程法和程序法来取得更好的环境成果。本文认为这是一个错误,认为如果我们可以确保程序机构能够充分代表所有与环境保护相关的价值,那么只有通过这些新模型才能实现长期环境保护。该条对在当前模型实施下是否有可能提出质疑。它进一步指出,通过在设计我们的环境保护机构时补充实体法,补充模型,可以更好地实现长期环境保护的目标。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号