首页> 外文期刊>Environmental law >DOES THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT OWN THE PORE SPACE UNDER PRIVATE LANDS IN THE WEST? IMPLICATIONS OF THE STOCK-RAISING HOMESTEAD ACT OF 1916 FOR GEOLOGIC STORAGE OF CARBON DIOXIDE
【24h】

DOES THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT OWN THE PORE SPACE UNDER PRIVATE LANDS IN THE WEST? IMPLICATIONS OF THE STOCK-RAISING HOMESTEAD ACT OF 1916 FOR GEOLOGIC STORAGE OF CARBON DIOXIDE

机译:西方私人土地上的联邦政府是否拥有孔隙空间? 1916年《加息霍乱法》对二氧化碳的地质存储的影响

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

This Article establishes that pursuant to the mineral reservation contained in the Stock-Raising Homestead Act of 1916 (SRHA), as well as U.S. Supreme Court jurisprudence that has further defined the scope of that reservation, the federal government likely holds title to some 70 million acres of subsurface pore space located under private land in the West. In addressing the issue of pore space ownership, scholars and regulators have focused on the question of who owns the pore space when the mineral estate has been severed from the surface estate. This approach, however, overlooks the critical fact that for the approximately 70 million acres of land patented under the SRHA, the United States government held the original fee simple absolute, and conveyed the land while retaining "all the coal and other minerals in the lands." In 1983 in Watt v. Western Nuclear, Inc., the Supreme Court delineated a four-part test for determining if something falls within the scope of the SRHA's mineral reservation-a test that was further explicated by the Court's decision in 2004 in BedRoc Limited, Inc. v. United States. This Article analyzes this jurisprudence vis-a-vis the question of whether or not pore space falls within the scope of the SRHA's mineral reservation. Based on a detailed analysis of the history of the SRHA and relevant jurisprudence by the Supreme Court and other federal and state courts, we conclude that the federal government likely owns the pore space for those lands patented under the SRHA. This conclusion has far reaching policy implications. For instance, states that have statutorily determined that ownership of the pore space is vested in the surface owner are now confronted by the prospect that these statutes are preempted by federal law when dealing with land originally conveyed by the SRHA. Moreover, given the significant acreage covered by the SRHA, federal ownership of pore space could arguably reduce the transaction costs associated with project development, thereby facilitating the rapid scaling of commercial geologic carbon storage projects.
机译:本条规定,根据1916年《饲养家园法》(SRHA)所包含的矿物保留,以及进一步界定了保留范围的美国最高法院判例,联邦政府可能拥有约7000万的所有权西部私人土地下的几英亩地下孔隙空间。在解决孔隙空间所有权问题时,学者和监管者关注的问题是,当矿物层从地表层中分离出来时,谁拥有孔隙空间。但是,这种方法忽略了一个关键事实,即在SRHA专利保护下的大约7000万英亩土地中,美国政府将原始费用简单保留为绝对,并在保留“土地上所有煤炭和其他矿物。” 1983年,在Watt v。Western Nuclear,Inc.一案中,最高法院划定了一个四部分的测试,以确定是否属于SRHA的矿物保留范围-该测试在2004年法院在BedRoc Limited中的判决中得到进一步阐述。 ,Inc.诉美国。本文针对该孔隙度是否在SRHA矿藏范围内的问题,对该法学进行了分析。根据最高法院以及其他联邦和州法院对SRHA的历史和相关判例的详细分析,我们得出结论,联邦政府可能拥有那些根据SRHA获得专利的土地的孔隙空间。这一结论具有深远的政策意义。例如,根据法律已经确定孔隙空间的所有权归表面所有者所有的州,现在面临着这样的前景,即这些法规在处理SRHA最初运送的土地时会被联邦法律所取代。此外,考虑到SRHA所覆盖的面积很大,联邦对孔隙空间的所有权可以减少与项目开发相关的交易成本,从而有利于商业地质碳存储项目的快速扩展。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Environmental law》 |2012年第2期|p.527-548|共22页
  • 作者单位

    United States National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL) and the University of Colorado at Boulder (UCB);

    University of Colorado Law School;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号