首页> 外文期刊>Environmental law >QUESTIONS REMAIN FOR THE TIMBER INDUSTRY AFTER SUPREME COURT'S DECISION IN DECKER V. NORTHWEST ENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE CENTER
【24h】

QUESTIONS REMAIN FOR THE TIMBER INDUSTRY AFTER SUPREME COURT'S DECISION IN DECKER V. NORTHWEST ENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE CENTER

机译:DECKER V.西北环境防御中心的最高法院决定后,木材行业的问题

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

After the Ninth Circuit's decision in Northwest Environmental Defense Center v. Decker (NEDC v. Decker) required Clean Water Act (CWA) permits for stormwater discharges from logging roads, the timber industry was placed in the difficult position of facing potential enforcement actions despite no practicably available permitting scheme. The Supreme Court's reversal of that decision, in Decker v. Northwest Environmental Defense Center (Decker), provides reassurance to the timber industry, other landowners and agencies in the West and elsewhere. However, due to the limited scope of the Supreme Court's opinion, the timber industry still faces the potential for further regulation under the CWA "Phase Ⅱ" stormwater program. This article discusses the NEDC v. Decker litigation, including its background and aftermath, underscores the practical difficulties in effectively regulating stormwater discharges from logging roads through the Clean Water Act National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit program, and highlights several related issues that remain unresolved.
机译:在第九巡回法院在西北环保防御中心诉德克(NEDC v。Decker)案的裁决要求通过《清洁水法》(CWA)许可从砍伐的道路排放雨水之后,尽管没有采取任何行动,木材行业处于面临潜在执法行动的困境中切实可行的许可方案。最高法院在Decker诉西北环境保护中心(Decker)中推翻了该裁决,为木材工业,西方及其他地区的其他土地所有者和代理机构提供了保证。但是,由于最高法院的意见范围有限,木材行业仍面临根据CWA“第二阶段”雨水计划进行进一步监管的潜力。本文讨论了NEDC诉Decker诉讼,包括其背景和后果,强调了通过《清洁水法》国家污染物排放消除系统(NPDES)许可计划有效监管伐木道路的雨水排放的实际困难,并着重指出了一些相关问题仍未解决。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号