...
首页> 外文期刊>The Environmental Law Reporter >The U.S. House of Representatives' Task Force on NEPA: The Professors Speak
【24h】

The U.S. House of Representatives' Task Force on NEPA: The Professors Speak

机译:美国众议院关于NEPA的工作组:教授讲话

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Earlier this year, the U.S. House of Representatives Resources Committee launched a Task Force on Improving the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA). organizing a number of hearings across the country. While industry representatives complained of interference and delays in project approvals, environmentalists asserted that the statute works and praised its venue for public participation. The aftermath of Hurricanes Katrina and Rita added more fuel to the controversy. In October 2005, over 200 law professors from across the country submitted written testimony to the Task Force, coordinated by Prof. Zygmunt Plater of Boston College Law School, Prof. Patrick Parenteau of Vermont Law School, and the author. This Article describes the Task Force, the hearings, and the law professors' submission, which is reprinted in full below. As their testimony reveals, the professors are supportive of NEPA and its basic mechanisms, particularly the roles of alternatives, public participation, and judicial review. They also make several recommendations for strengthening the environmental review process.
机译:今年早些时候,美国众议院资源委员会成立了一个“改善国家环境政策法”(NEPA)的工作组。在全国范围内组织一些听证会。尽管行业代表抱怨项目批准受到干扰和延误,但环保主义者断言该法规行之有效,并赞扬其公众参与的场所。卡特里娜(Katrina)和丽塔(Rita)飓风的余波使这场争论更加激烈。 2005年10月,在波士顿学院法学院的齐格蒙特·普拉特教授,佛蒙特州法学院的帕特里克·帕特诺(Patrick Parenteau)教授和作者的配合下,来自全国各地的200多位法律教授向工作队提交了书面证词。本文介绍了工作组,听证会和法学教授的来稿,全文在下面重印。正如他们的证词所表明的,教授们支持NEPA及其基本机制,特别是替代方案,公众参与和司法审查的作用。他们还提出了一些加强环境审查程序的建议。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号