首页> 外文期刊>The Environmental Law Reporter >The Godavarman Case: The Indian Supreme Court's Breach of Constitutional Boundaries in Managing India's Forests
【24h】

The Godavarman Case: The Indian Supreme Court's Breach of Constitutional Boundaries in Managing India's Forests

机译:戈达瓦曼案:印度最高法院在管理印度森林方面违反宪法边界

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

With its ruling in the 1995 Godavarman case, the Supreme Court of India commandeered for itself the roles of policymaker, administrator, and interpreter of the law. The Court s actions pursuant to this ruling have had serious effects on India's forest policy. In this Article, Armin Rosencranz, Edward Boenig, and Brinda Dutta explore the ramifications of the Supreme Court s actions. The authors begin with an overview of changes in forest policy following the 1995 ruling and describe the deleterious effects that these changes have had on Indian forests. They then analyze the constitutionality of the Court's actions and evaluate whether these actions have had the effect that the Court desired. Finally, the authors conclude with some suggestions for resolving theproblems created by the Court's overstepping of its judicial role.
机译:印度最高法院凭借其在1995年Godavarman案中的裁决,亲自担任了政策制定者,管理者和法律解释者的角色。法院根据该裁决采取的行动对印度的森林政策产生了严重影响。在本文中,Armin Rosencranz,Edward Boenig和Brinda Dutta探索了最高法院诉讼的后果。作者首先概述了1995年裁定后森林政策的变化,并描述了这些变化对印度森林的有害影响。然后,他们分析了法院诉讼的合宪性,并评估了这些诉讼是否达到了法院期望的效果。最后,作者最后提出了一些建议,以解决法院过度行使其司法职能所产生的问题。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号