首页> 外文期刊>Environmental Impact Assesment Review >Bringing science into river systems cumulative effects assessment practice
【24h】

Bringing science into river systems cumulative effects assessment practice

机译:将科学纳入河流系统累积影响评估实践

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Fast-paced watershed change, driven by anthropogenic development, is threatening the sustainability of freshwater resources across the globe. Developments within watersheds interact in a manner that is additive and synergistic over space and time. Such cumulative environmental effects are defined as the results of actions that are individually minor but collectively significant when added to other past, present, and reasonably foreseeable future actions. Cumulative effects assessment (CEA) then is broadly defined as the process of evaluating the potential impacts of such collective actions on the environment and is a requirement in many countries, including in Canada at the federal level under the Canadian Environmental Assessment Act. However, current approaches to CEA for river systems are proving to be ineffective, which is largely attributed to the disconnect between CEA science and practice. We highlight this gap herein by discussing contradictions in the CEA literature, challenges in quantifying cumulative interactions, including overcoming spatiotemporal scale issues, multiple hydrologic and ecological pathways, and lack of predictive analysis. Our analysis shows there is a need for improved CEA for river systems, and in responding to this need we propose a conceptual framework for better integrating science and practice for improved CEA for river systems using one of the most adversely affected rivers basins in Canada, the Athabasca River, as our model. We conclude by addressing the challenges inherent to CEA with the intent of providing scientists with ways to help improve CEA of river systems.
机译:人为发展驱动的分水岭快速变化,正在威胁全球淡水资源的可持续性。流域内的发展在空间和时间上以累加和协同的方式相互作用。这种累积的环境影响被定义为行动的结果,这些行动虽然较小,但在添加到其他过去,现在和可以合理预见的未来行动中时,具有集体意义。因此,累积影响评估(CEA)被广泛定义为评估此类集体行动对环境的潜在影响的过程,并且是许多国家(包括加拿大在加拿大根据《加拿大环境评估法》在联邦一级)的要求。但是,事实证明,当前对河流系统进行CEA的方法无效,这在很大程度上归因于CEA科学与实践之间的脱节。我们通过讨论CEA文献中的矛盾,量化累积相互作用的挑战(包括克服时空尺度问题,多种水文和生态途径以及缺乏预测性分析)来突出本文中的差距。我们的分析表明,有必要改进河流系统的CEA,为此,我们提出了一个概念框架,以利用加拿大受灾最严重的流域之一,将科学与实践更好地结合起来,以改进河流系统的CEA。阿萨巴斯卡河,作为我们的典范。最后,我们通过解决CEA固有的挑战,旨在为科学家提供帮助改善河流系统CEA的方法。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号