首页> 外文期刊>Environmental history >Public Power, Private Dams: The Hells Canyon High Dam Controversy
【24h】

Public Power, Private Dams: The Hells Canyon High Dam Controversy

机译:公共权力,私人水坝:地狱峡谷高坝争议

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

After World War II, hydropower proposals for the upper Snake River generated enormous political controversy. Proposed as an extension of the federally controlled Columbia River power system initiated by the New Deal, the Hells Canyon High Dam represented government expansion into a region historically served by privately financed electric power enterprise. Resisting the growth of publicly controlled electric power, the Idaho Power Company countered with plans for a smaller, privately financed dam (eventually the company proposed three hydropower dams in Hells Canyon, but with a total generating capacity smaller than the government's single high dam). With this, the battle was joined: public power versus investor-owned utilities. In a politically charged debate, key questions were posed: How best to serve the interests of the American people and the citizens of southern Idaho? And what in fact constituted the "public interest?"
机译:第二次世界大战后,斯内克河上游的水电提议引起了巨大的政治争议。提议作为新政发起的联邦控制的哥伦比亚河电力系统的扩展,地狱峡谷高水坝代表了政府向历史上由私人电力企业服务的地区的扩张。为了抵制公共控制电力的增长,爱达荷州电力公司反对建造一个较小的,由私人融资的水坝的计划(最终,该公司在地狱峡谷中提出了三个水力发电大坝,但总发电量小于政府的单个高水坝)。这样,战斗就加入了:公共权力与投资者拥有的公用事业。在一场充满政治色彩的辩论中,提出了关键问题:如何才能最好地为美国人民和爱达荷州南部的人民的利益服务?究竟什么构成了“公共利益”?

著录项

  • 来源
    《Environmental history》 |2008年第2期|373-374|共2页
  • 作者

  • 作者单位
  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号