...
首页> 外文期刊>Environmental earth sciences >Regional recharge estimation using multiple methods: an application in the Annapolis Valley, Nova Scotia (Canada)
【24h】

Regional recharge estimation using multiple methods: an application in the Annapolis Valley, Nova Scotia (Canada)

机译:使用多种方法进行区域补给估算:在新斯科舍省安纳波利斯谷的应用(加拿大)

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Recharge is a key parameter in groundwater resources management, and a reliable estimate of recharge is required for their sustainable development. Several methods are available to evaluate recharge; however, selecting the appropriate one is made difficult because each method has its advantages and drawbacks, and results can vary greatly from one method to another. Recharge methods can actually refer to different processes. This paper compares and discusses the results obtained from five regional-scale recharge assessment approaches applied to a fractured rock aquifer in a region with a temperate and humid climate (Annapolis Valley, Nova Scotia, Canada). These methods are distinguished between those providing estimates of the net infiltration (I) into the subsurface (river hydrograph separation and soil moisture balance) from those considering the net recharge (W) to the regional bedrock aquifer (river 7-day low-flows, the corrected soil moisture balance, a numerical groundwater flow model developed with FEFLOW and an infiltration model developed with HELP). The estimated net infiltration ranges from 160 to 250 mm/year, whereas the net recharge estimates range from 80 to 175 mm/year for the entire study area. Although different assessment methods were used, the estimated recharge range is still quite large, demonstrating the importance of using several methods. This case study should provide guidance on choices to be made in the development of a strategy for assessing representative values of aquifer recharge at the regional scale under similar geological and climatic conditions. The use of multiple complementary approaches should lead to a better understanding of the system dynamics and to better defined a representative range of recharge estimates.
机译:补给是地下水资源管理中的一个关键参数,为可持续发展需要可靠的补给估算。有几种方法可以评估补给。但是,由于每种方法都有其优点和缺点,因此选择合适的方法变得很困难,并且结果可能因一种方法而异。充电方法实际上可以引用不同的过程。本文比较并讨论了在温带和潮湿气候地区(加拿大新斯科舍省安那波利斯谷地)对裂隙含水层施加的五种区域规模补给评估方法所获得的结果。这些方法的区别在于,提供了对地下净渗透量(I)的估算(河流水位分离和土壤水分平衡)的方法与考虑了对区域基岩含水层的净补给量(W)(河流7天的低流量,校正后的土壤水分平衡,使用FEFLOW开发的数值地下水流模型和通过HELP开发的渗透模型)。整个研究区域的估计净入渗量为160至250毫米/年,而净补给量估计为80至175毫米/年。尽管使用了不同的评估方法,但估计的补给范围仍然很大,这表明使用几种方法的重要性。该案例研究应为制定战略以评估在相似的地质和气候条件下区域规模的含水层补给的代表性价值提供指导。多种互补方法的使用应有助于更好地了解系统动力学,并更好地定义代表性的补给估算范围。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号