首页> 外文期刊>Environmental earth sciences >GIS-based modeling of rainfall-induced landslides using data mining-based functional trees classifier with AdaBoost, Bagging, and MultiBoost ensemble frameworks
【24h】

GIS-based modeling of rainfall-induced landslides using data mining-based functional trees classifier with AdaBoost, Bagging, and MultiBoost ensemble frameworks

机译:使用具有AdaBoost,Bagging和MultiBoost集成框架的基于数据挖掘的功能树分类器,基于GIS的降雨诱发滑坡建模

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The main objective of this study is to propose and verify a novel ensemble methodology that could improve prediction performances of landslide susceptibility models. The proposed methodology is based on the functional tree classifier and three current state-of-the art machine learning ensemble frameworks, Bagging, AdaBoost, and MultiBoost. According to current literature, these methods have been rarely used for the modeling of rainfall-induced landslides. The corridor of the National Road 32 (Vietnam) was selected as a case study. In the first stage, the landslide inventory map with 262 landslide polygons that occurred during the last 20 years was constructed and then was randomly partitioned into a ratio of 70/30 for training and validating the models. Second, ten landslide conditioning factors were prepared such as slope, aspect, relief amplitude, topographic wetness index, topographic shape, distance to roads, distance to rivers, distance to faults, lithology, and rainfall. The model performance was assessed and compared using the receiver operating characteristic and statistical evaluation measures. Overall, the FT with Bagging model has the highest prediction capability (AUC = 0.917), followed by the FT with MultiBoost model (AUC = 0.910), the FT model (AUC = 0.898), and the FT with AdaBoost model (AUC = 0.882). Compared with those derived from popular methods such as J48 decision trees and artificial neural networks, the performance of the FT with Bagging model is better. Therefore, it can be concluded that the FT with Bagging is promising and could be used as an alternative in landslide susceptibility assessment. The result in this study is useful for land use planning and decision making in landslide prone areas.
机译:这项研究的主要目的是提出和验证一种新颖的集成方法,可以改善滑坡敏感性模型的预测性能。所提出的方法基于功能树分类器和三个当前最先进的机器学习集成框架Bagging,AdaBoost和MultiBoost。根据目前的文献,这些方法很少用于降雨诱发的滑坡的建模。选择了32号国道(越南)的走廊作为案例研究。在第一阶段,构造了过去20年中发生的262个滑坡多边形的滑坡清单图,然后将其随机划分为70/30的比例,以训练和验证模型。其次,准备了十个滑坡条件,例如坡度,坡向,起伏幅度,地形湿度指数,地形形状,距道路的距离,距河流的距离,距断层的距离,岩性和降雨。使用接收器的工作特性和统计评估方法对模型性能进行评估和比较。总体而言,带袋装模型的FT具有最高的预测能力(AUC = 0.917),其次是具有MultiBoost模型的FT(AUC = 0.910),FT模型(AUC = 0.898)和具有AdaBoost模型的FT(AUC = 0.882) )。与从流行的方法(例如J48决策树和人工神经网络)衍生的方法相比,带有Bagging模型的FT的性能更好。因此,可以得出结论,带套袋的FT是有前途的,可以作为滑坡敏感性评估的替代方法。这项研究的结果对于滑坡易发地区的土地利用规划和决策很有用。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Environmental earth sciences》 |2016年第14期|1101.1-1101.22|共22页
  • 作者单位

    Univ Coll Southeast Norway, Dept Business Adm & Comp Sci, Geog Informat Syst Grp, N-3800 Bo I Telemark, Norway;

    Vietnam Inst Geosci & Mineral Resources, Dept Tecton & Geomorphol, Hanoi, Vietnam;

    Univ Putra Malaysia, Dept Civil Engn, GISRC, Fac Engn, Serdang 43400, Selangor, Malaysia|Sejong Univ, Dept Geoinformat Engn, 209 Neungdong Ro Gwangjingu, Seoul 05006, South Korea;

    Gujarat Technol Univ, Dept Civil Engn, Nr Visat Three Rd, Ahmadabad 382424, Gujarat, India;

    Hanoi Univ Min & Geol, Dept Geol Engn, Hanoi, Vietnam;

    Norwegian Univ Life Sci, Dept Math Sci & Technol, POB 5003 IMT, N-1432 As, Norway;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

    Landslide; GIS; Functional trees; AdaBoost; MultiBoost; Bagging; Vietnam;

    机译:滑坡;GIS;功能树;AdaBoost;MultiBoost;装袋;越南;

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号