首页> 外文期刊>Environmental Geology >Assessing LNRF, FR, and AHP models in landslide susceptibility mapping index: a comparative study of Nojian watershed in Lorestan province, Iran
【24h】

Assessing LNRF, FR, and AHP models in landslide susceptibility mapping index: a comparative study of Nojian watershed in Lorestan province, Iran

机译:在滑坡敏感性测绘指数中评估LNRF,FR和AHP模型:伊朗洛雷斯坦省Nojian流域的比较研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Landslides and slope instabilities are major risks for human activities which often lead to economic losses and human fatalities all over the world. The main purpose of this study is to evaluate and compare the results of Landslide Nominal Risk Factor (LNRF), Frequency Ratio (FR), and Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) models in mapping Landslide Susceptibility Index (LSI). The study case, Nojian watershed with an area of 344.91 km(2), is located in Lorestan province of Iran. The procedure was as follows: first, the effective factors of the landslide basin were prepared for each layer in the GIS software. Then, the layers and the landslides of the basin were also prepared using aerial photographs, satellite images, and fieldwork. Next, the effective factors of the layers were overlapped with the map of landslide distribution to specify the role of units in such distribution. Finally, nine factors including lithology, slope, aspect, altitude, distance from the fault, distance from river, fault land use, rainfall, and altitude were found to be effective elements in landslide occurrence of the basin. The final maps of LSI were prepared based on seven factors using LNRF, FR, and AHP models in GIS. The index of the quality sum (Qs) was also used to assess the accuracy of the LSI maps. The results of the three models with LNRF (40%), FR (39%), and AHP (44%) indicated that the whole study area was located in the classes of high to very high hazard. The Qs values for the three models above were also found to be 0.51, 0.70 and 0.70, respectively. In comparison, according to the amount of Qs, the results of AHP and FR models have slightly better performed than the LNRF model in determining the LSI maps in the study area. Finally, the study watershed was classified into five classes based on LSI as very low, low, moderate, high, and very high. The landslide susceptibility maps can be helpful to select sites and mitigate landslide hazards in the study area and the regions with similar conditions.
机译:滑坡和边坡的不稳定性是人类活动的主要风险,往往导致全世界的经济损失和人员伤亡。这项研究的主要目的是评估和比较滑坡名义风险指数(LNRF),频率比(FR)和层次分析模型(AHP)模型在绘制滑坡敏感性指数(LSI)时的结果。该研究案例为Nojian流域,面积344.91 km(2),位于伊朗的洛雷斯坦省。步骤如下:首先,在GIS软件中为每一层准备滑坡盆地的影响因子。然后,还使用航空照片,卫星图像和野外作业来准备盆地的层和滑坡。接下来,将各层的有效因子与滑坡分布图重叠,以指定单位在这种分布中的作用。最后,发现了包括岩性,坡度,纵横比,高度,到断层的距离,到河流的距离,断层的土地利用,降雨和高度在内的九个因素是盆地滑坡发生的有效因素。使用GIS中的LNRF,FR和AHP模型,基于七个因素准备了LSI的最终地图。质量总和(Qs)的索引也用于评估LSI图的准确性。具有LNRF(40%),FR(39%)和AHP(44%)的三个模型的结果表明,整个研究区域位于高到非常高的危险等级中。上面三个模型的Qs值也分别为0.51、0.70和0.70。相比之下,根据Qs的数量,在确定研究区域的LSI图时,AHP和FR模型的结果比LNRF模型的结果略好。最后,基于LSI,研究分水岭分为五类:极低,低,中,高和极高。滑坡敏感性图有助于选择研究地点和研究条件相似地区的滑坡危害。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号