...
首页> 外文期刊>Environmental Conservation >Attitudes of coastal-forest users in Eastern Cape Province to management options arising from new South African forest policies
【24h】

Attitudes of coastal-forest users in Eastern Cape Province to management options arising from new South African forest policies

机译:东开普省沿海森林使用者对南非新森林政策产生的管理选择的态度

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

New participatory forest management policies are being promoted in South Africa involving devolution from the state to local communities at a time when traditional authority has been eroded and is weak. Here, attitudes of forest stakeholders (forest resource users and managers) to three possible forest management policies, as well as to resource use, were investigated using questionnaires. There was concordance in the attitudes of resource users and managers and a general lack of support for community forest management (CFM), particularly among older resource users. Power shifts, uncertainty about land tenure and the management of what has essentially become an open-access system, all confound attempts to implement community-based forestry programmes. Local communities appeared to be wary of taking on responsibility for forest management at this time and indicated comparatively stronger support for state forest management (SFM). Forest stakeholders were more equivocal in their support for participatory forest management (PFM), although this probably reflects a poor understanding by forest users of the new PFM process. No stakeholders supported a total ban on forest resource use, but all supported controlled use. These latter attitudes were independent of the preferred management system (i.e. CFM, SFM or PFM). This study corroborates the view that CFM has been overemphasized. Rather than narrowing forest management around communities, but recognizing the state's incapacity to ensure the integrity of forest resources into the future without the co-operation of forest users, an all-inclusive approach, such as PFM, provides for greater management input by the state.
机译:在南非,正在推广新的参与性森林管理政策,其中包括在传统权威受到侵蚀和薄弱的时候从国家下放到地方社区。在这里,使用问卷调查了森林利益相关者(森林资源使用者和管理者)对三种可能的森林管理政策以及资源利用的态度。资源使用者和管理者的态度一致,普遍缺乏对社区森林管理的支持,特别是在较老的资源使用者中间。权力转移,土地使用权的不确定性以及实质上已成为开放获取系统的管理,所有这些都难以实施以社区为基础的林业计划。此时,当地社区似乎对担负起森林管理的责任感到谨慎,并表示对州森林管理(SFM)的支持相对较强。森林利益相关者对参与性森林管理(PFM)的支持更加模棱两可,尽管这可能反映了森林使用者对新的PFM过程的理解不佳。没有利益相关者支持完全禁止森林资源使用,但是所有利益相关者都支持受控使用。后一种态度与首选的管理系统(即CFM,SFM或PFM)无关。这项研究证实了过分强调CFM的观点。与其将社区周围的森林管理范围缩小,还不如认识到该州无权在没有森林使用者合作的情况下确保未来森林资源的完整性,而是采用全包方法(例如PFM)为该州提供了更多的管理投入。 。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号