首页> 外文期刊>Environmental & Resource Economics >Transaction Costs of Upstream Versus Downstream Pricing of CO_2 Emissions
【24h】

Transaction Costs of Upstream Versus Downstream Pricing of CO_2 Emissions

机译:CO_2排放的上游与下游定价的交易成本

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

To the best of our knowledge, this is the first paper comparing empirically the transaction costs of the monitoring, reporting and verification (MRV) required by two environmental regulations aimed to cost-efficiently reduce greenhouse gas emissions: a carbon dioxide (CO2) tax and an emissions trading system. We do this in the case of Sweden, where a set of firms are covered by both types of regulationsthe Swedish CO2 tax and the European Union's Emissions Trading System (EU ETS). Our results indicate that there is a significant degree of heterogeneity in the transaction costs of the firms in our sample. Moreover, for some of the firms, the transaction costs are high when compared with the actual cost of the CO2 tax and the price of the EU ETS. Furthermore, we find that the MRV costs are lower for CO2 taxation than for the EU ETS, which confirms the general view that regulating emissions upstream via a CO2 tax yields lower transaction costs vis-a-vis downstream regulation via emissions trading.
机译:据我们所知,这是第一篇论文,经验上来比较了两项环境法规所要求的监测,报告和验证(MRV)的交易成本,旨在经验丰富地减少温室气体排放量:二氧化碳(二氧化碳)税和税排放交易系统。在瑞典的情况下,我们这样做,这两种公司都被瑞典二氧化碳税和欧盟排放交易系统(欧盟ETS)覆盖。我们的结果表明,我们在我们样本中公司的交易成本存在显着程度的异质性。此外,对于一些公司而言,与二氧化碳税的实际成本和欧盟ETS价格相比,交易成本很高。此外,我们发现二氧化碳税收的MRV成本低于EU ETS,这证实了通过二氧化碳税收调控排放的一般性观点,收益率降低交易成本通过排放交易降低交易费用。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号