首页> 外文期刊>Environment reporter >Arranger Liability Still Confusing Courts Four Years After Supreme Court Decision
【24h】

Arranger Liability Still Confusing Courts Four Years After Supreme Court Decision

机译:最高法院判决四年后,安排人的责任仍然困扰着法院

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The scope of arranger liability after Burlington Northern is still confusing lower courts and could be headed to the U.S. Supreme Court for another look, speakers at a superfund webinar said Sept. 24. The Supreme Court may also be asked to reconsider the allocation and apportionment portion of the Burlington Northern decision and clarify the distinction between Sections 107 and 113 of the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act, the speakers said during Bloomberg BNA's webinar, "Not Settling for Less: Finality in CERCLA Settlements."
机译:超级基金网络研讨会的发言人于9月24日说,在伯灵顿北方公司之后,安排人责任的范围仍使下级法院感到困惑,并有可能前往美国最高法院再审视。也可能会要求最高法院重新考虑分配和分配部分。发言人在彭博社(Bloomberg BNA)的网络研讨会上说:“根据伯灵顿北方政府的决定,并明确了《综合环境响应,补偿和责任法》第107节和第113节之间的区别,“不容小tling:CERCLA定居点的确定性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号