...
首页> 外文期刊>Environment reporter >Court Should Rule Undisclosed Discharges Not Entitled to Permit Shield, Advocates Say
【24h】

Court Should Rule Undisclosed Discharges Not Entitled to Permit Shield, Advocates Say

机译:辩护人称,法院应裁定未作准许的未公开出庭

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

A federal district court correctly determined A&G Coal Corp.'s selenium discharges aren't protected under the Clean Water Act permit shield, environmental groups said in a brief filed in a federal appeals court (S. Appalachian Mountain Stewards v. A&G Coal Corp., 4th Cir., No. 13-2050, 2/3/14). The U.S. District Court for the Western District of Virginia was right to rule that the Virginia coal company couldn't use the permit shield defense because the company didn't list selenium in its Clean Water Act Section 402 National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System permit application, Southern Appalachian Mountain Stewards, the Sierra Club and Appalachian Mountain Stewards said in the Feb. 3 brief to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit.
机译:环保组织在联邦上诉法院提起的简短陈述中说,联邦地方法院正确地确定了A&G Coal Corp.的硒排放不受“清洁水法”许可证保护的保护(S. Appalachian Mountain Stewards诉A&G Coal Corp.。 ,4th Cir。,No.13-2050,2/3/14)。美国弗吉尼亚州西区地方法院有权裁定弗吉尼亚煤炭公司不能使用许可证盾牌辩护权,因为该公司未在其《清洁水法》第402条国家污染物排放消除系统许可证申请中列出硒,南部阿巴拉契亚山脉管家,塞拉俱乐部和阿巴拉契亚山脉管家在2月3日向美国第四巡回上诉法院提交的摘要中说。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号