首页> 外文期刊>Environment reporter >Ohio Valley Envtl. Coal., Inc. v. Fola Coal Co.
【24h】

Ohio Valley Envtl. Coal., Inc. v. Fola Coal Co.

机译:俄亥俄州谷环境。 Coal。,Inc.诉Fola Coal Co.

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

In multiple ways, the chemical and the biological components of the aquatic ecosystems found in Stillhouse Branch have been significantly adversely affected by Defendant's discharges. The water chemistry of this stream has been dramatically altered, containing levels of ionic salts-measured as conductivity-which are scientifically proven to be seriously detrimental to aquatic life. The biological characteristics of the stream have also been significantly injured, in that species diversity-and, in some areas, overall aquatic life abundance-is profoundly reduced. Stillhouse Branch is unquestionably biologically impaired, in violation of West Virginia's narrative water quality standards, with current WVSCI scores falling well below the threshold score of 68. Losing diversity in aquatic life, as sensitive species are extirpated and only pollution-tolerant species survive, is akin to the canary in a coal mine. This West Virginia stream, like the reference streams used to formulate WVSCI, was once a thriving aquatic ecosystem. As key ingredients to West Virginia's once abundant clean water, the upper reaches of West Virginia's complex network of flowing streams provide critical attributes-"functions," in ecological science-that support the downstream water quality relied upon by West Virginians for drinking water, fishing and recreation, and important economic uses. Protecting these uses is the overriding purpose of West Virginia's water quality standards and the goal of the state's permit requirements. The Court thus FINDS that Plaintiffs have established, by a preponderance of the evidence, that Defendant has committed at least one violation of its permits by discharging into Stillhouse Branch high levels of ionic pollution, which have caused or materially contributed to a significant adverse impact to the chemical and biological components of the stream's aquatic ecosystem, in violation of the narrative water quality standards incorporated into those permits. The Court DIRECTS the Clerk to send a copy of this written Opinion and Order to counsel of record and any unrepresented parties.
机译:在斯蒂尔豪斯分公司发现的水生生态系统的化学和生物成分在许多方面受到被告排放物的不利影响。该物流的水化学性质已经发生了巨大变化,其中包含的离子盐含量(以电导率衡量)已被科学证明严重损害了水生生物。溪流的生物学特性也受到严重损害,因为物种的多样性以及某些地区的整体水生生物丰度大大降低了。斯蒂尔豪斯分校无疑在生物学上受到了损害,违反了西弗吉尼亚州的叙述性水质标准,目前的WVSCI得分远低于68的阈值得分。类似于煤矿中的金丝雀。与用来配制WVSCI的参考河流一样,西弗吉尼亚的河流曾经是一个繁荣的水生生态系统。作为西弗吉尼亚州曾经丰富的洁净水的关键成分,西弗吉尼亚州复杂的水流上游提供了生态学的关键属性(“功能”),支持西弗吉尼亚州人用于饮用水,捕鱼的下游水质和娱乐以及重要的经济用途。保护这些用途是西弗吉尼亚州水质标准的首要目标,也是州许可证要求的目标。因此,法院认为,原告通过大量证据确定,被告通过向Stillhouse分公司排放高水平的离子污染,从而至少或一次违反了其许可证,造成或严重造成了严重的不利影响。溪流水生生态系统中的化学和生物成分,违反了这些许可证中包含的叙述性水质标准。法院指示秘书将本书面意见和命令的副本发送给记录律师和任何无律师代表的当事方。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Environment reporter》 |2015年第11期|1473-1497|共25页
  • 作者

  • 作者单位
  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号