...
首页> 外文期刊>Environment reporter >Energy Industry Argues EPA Proposal On Carbon Emissions Ripe for Review
【24h】

Energy Industry Argues EPA Proposal On Carbon Emissions Ripe for Review

机译:能源行业争辩EPA关于碳排放的提案已成熟,需要审查

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

The Environmental Protection Agency's decision to regulate carbon dioxide emissions from existing power plants under Section 111 (d) of the Clean Air Act is a final agency action subject to judicial review, two trade associations argue in an amicus brief supporting Murray Energy Corp.'s effort to block the proposed regulation in federal appellate court (In re Murray Energy Corp., D.C. Cir., No. 14-1112, brie/is filed 12/23/14; Murray Energy Corp. v. EPA, D.C. Cir., No. 14-1151, briefs filed 12/23/14). The National Mining Association and the American Coalition for Clean Coal Electricity disputed the EPA's argument that the rule is a proposal that cannot yet be subjected to legal challenges. "EPA's contention that it has an open mind on the basic question of its authority to issue Section 111 (d) regulations and that it therefore may not issue a final Section 111 (d) rule at all is absurd," the trade associations said in a Dec. 23 brief filed in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit. "The Agency has not only made a final decision to regulate, it has made that regulation its highest priority."
机译:两家贸易协会在支持穆雷能源公司(Murray Energy Corp.)努力阻止联邦上诉法院的拟议法规(关于再上诉Murray Energy Corp.,DC Cir。,第14-1112号,于2012年12月23日提起贿赂; Murray Energy Corp.诉EPA,DC Cir。, 14-1151号,摘要提交时间:12/23/14)。美国国家矿业协会和美国清洁煤电联盟对EPA的观点提出异议,认为该规则是一项尚不能受到法律质疑的提议。贸易协会在一份声明中说:“ EPA关于在发布第111(d)条规定的权限这一基本问题上持开放态度,因此根本不可能发布第111(d)条的最终规则的主张是荒谬的。” 12月23日向美国上诉法院提交的哥伦比亚特区巡回法院案情简介。 “原子能机构不仅做出了管制的最终决定,而且还将该管制作为最高优先事项。”

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号