首页> 外文期刊>Environment reporter >Judge’s Request in Maui Water Row Echoes Supreme Court Ruling
【24h】

Judge’s Request in Maui Water Row Echoes Supreme Court Ruling

机译:法官在毛伊岛水费回应最高法院裁决

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

A Clean Water Act permit dispute between environmental groups and a Hawaii county’s wastewater facility is unable to be resolved without more information that the U.S. Supreme Courtrecently deemed necessary, a federal district court said.Hawaii Wildlife Fund and other environmental advocacy groups moved for summary judgment, arguing there is undisputed evidence Maui County, Hawaii, discharged pollutants at itswastewater reclamation facility without a permit. But it’s not yet clear a permit is necessary, the U.S. District Court for the District of Hawaii said in a Wednesday request for clearer detailsfrom both parties.The county also moved for summary judgment and argued the groups lack admissible evidence of a violation. Both motions turn on whether the discharged, treated wastewater from thecounty’s reclamation facility is the “functional equivalent of a direct discharge” into the Pacific Ocean, Judge Susan Oki Mollway said.
机译:在没有更多信息的情况下,在环境团体和夏威夷县的废水设施之间的纠纷仍然无法解决美国最高法院的信息 联邦地区法院最近被视为必要。 夏威夷野生动物基金和其他环境宣传团体搬迁总结判决,争论有无可争议的证据毛伊县,夏威夷,在其上排放污染物 没有许可证的废水填海机构。 但尚未明确许可是必要的,美国地区法院在夏威夷地区在星期三申请更清楚地详细说明 来自双方。 该县还搬迁了总结判决,并争论群体缺乏违规证据。 这两个动作都可以打开排出的,处理过的废水 苏珊奥尼·莫尔韦法官说,县的填海工具是太平洋的“直接出院的直接放电”。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号