首页> 外文期刊>Environment reporter - Cases >Suncoast Waterkeeper v. City of St. Petersburg
【24h】

Suncoast Waterkeeper v. City of St. Petersburg

机译:Suncoast Waterkeeper诉圣彼得堡市

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Florida city is not entitled to judgment on Clean Water Act citizen suit claim brought by environmental groups, because, even though Florida agency brought enforcement action against city and act bars claims where state commenced enforcement action against alleged polluter, state is diligently prosecuting enforcement proceeding, and state statutory scheme is comparable to enforcement provisions of act: (1) act provides general public opportunity to participate in enforcement proceedings, and (2) Florida law only provides opportunity for parties with substantial interest to participate in proceedings and only after enforcement order is issued, and does not provide general public with opportunity to participate in enforcement proceedings comparable to public participation provisions of act.
机译:佛罗里达市无权就环境团体提起的《清洁水法》公民诉讼要求做出判决,因为即使佛罗里达州的机构针对该市提起了执法行动,并且在州针对被指控的污染者开始采取执法行动的情况下也禁止了索赔,但该州仍在努力起诉执法程序,并且州法定计划可与法令的执行条款相提并论:(1)法令为公众提供了参与执行程序的机会,并且(2)佛罗里达州法律仅向具有重大利益的当事方提供了参与程序的机会,并且只有在执行命令得到执行之后已发布,并且没有向公众提供与法案中的公众参与条款相当的参与执法程序的机会。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Environment reporter - Cases》 |2018年第20期|2399-2403|共5页
  • 作者

  • 作者单位
  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号