...
首页> 外文期刊>Environment International >COMPARISON OF NATURAL AND FORCED VENTILATION FOR RADON MITIGATION IN HOUSES
【24h】

COMPARISON OF NATURAL AND FORCED VENTILATION FOR RADON MITIGATION IN HOUSES

机译:房屋中RA气自然通风和强迫通风的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Radon mitigation by natural basement ventilation was compared to mitigation by forced ventilation (pressurization) and to mitigation by the operation of a modified heating and air conditioning (HAC) system in a series of experiments conducted during the spring and summer in a research house. Both natural ventilation and basement pressurization reduced average basement radon concentrations from 800 Bq m~(-3) to less than 150 Bq m~(-3). Natural ventilation reduced radon levels both by dilution and by decreasing basement depressurization and thus the radon entry rate. Basement pressurization reduced radon levels by increasing ventilation and lowering subslab radon levels, but is significantly more difficult to implement than natural ventilation. The operation of the forced air HAC system with a duct that supplied additional outside air to the return side did not reduce indoor radon concentrations. These experiments have clearly demonstrated the relationship between the outdoor-basement pressure differential and the radon entry rate, ventilation rate, and radon levels.
机译:在春季和夏季在研究室进行的一系列实验中,比较了通过自然地下室通风进行的on气缓解与通过强制通风(加压)的and气缓解以及通过使用改进的加热和空调(HAC)系统进行的compared气缓解。自然通风和地下室增压都将地下室的平均ra气浓度从800 Bq m〜(-3)降低到150 Bq m〜(-3)以下。自然通风通过稀释和降低地下室减压降低reduced含量,从而降低entry进入率。地下室加压通过增加通风量和降低平板下部的don水平降低了levels水平,但比自然通风要难得多。带管道向回程侧提供额外外部空气的强制空气HAC系统的运行不会降低室内did浓度。这些实验清楚地证明了室外地下室压力差与the进入率,通风率和ra水平之间的关系。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号