首页> 外文期刊>Environment international >Health impact assessment of PM_(2.5)-related mitigation scenarios using local risk coefficient estimates in 9 Japanese cities
【24h】

Health impact assessment of PM_(2.5)-related mitigation scenarios using local risk coefficient estimates in 9 Japanese cities

机译:使用日本9个城市的局部风险系数估计值,对PM_(2.5)相关缓解情景的健康影响评估

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Previous studies have highlighted the negative effects of PM2.5 on mortality, expressed in terms of attributable deaths and life years lost. However, there are very few studies assessing the health impacts of air pollution in terms of economic burden/benefits. This study assessed the health impact of two hypothetical interventions among sex- and age-specific risk populations using a robust risk estimation and economic valuation process. We utilized the sex- and age-stratified daily all-cause mortality together with the daily PM2.5 of the 9 Japanese cities from 2002 to 2008 in estimating the relative risks. The estimated risks were then utilized for the economic valuation of co-benefits/burden with respect to the two hypothetical PM2.5-related mitigation scenarios, in comparison to status quo, namely: i) decrease to Japanese standards, and ii) decrease to WHO standards. Impact of these interventions on health were assessed using the following HIA metrics: attributable mortality, attributable years life lost, and environmental health impact. A 10-mu g/m(3) increase in PM2.5 would increase the risk by 0.52% (95% CI: -0.91% to 1.99%) for all-cause mortality, with varying risk estimates per subgroup. High economic burdens were estimated at status quo, with particularly distinct burden difference for age-specific mortality; 0.40 trillion yen (0-64 y.o.) and 1.50 trillion yen ( 64 y.o.). If stricter standards, relative to status quo, were to be enforced, i.e. WHO standard, there is a potential to yield economic benefits in the same risk population; 0.26 trillion yen (0-64 y.o.) and 0.98 trillion yen ( 64 y.o.). We did not observe any substantial difference with the burden and benefit related to sex- specific mortality. Using the estimated local risk coefficients complemented with the valuation of the risks, policymaking entities will have the opportunity to operate their own HIA to assess the relevant air pollution-related health impacts.
机译:先前的研究强调了PM2.5对死亡率的负面影响,以可归因的死亡和生命年限表示。但是,很少有研究从经济负担/利益的角度评估空气污染对健康的影响。这项研究使用稳健的风险估算和经济评估流程,评估了两种假设干预措施对特定性别和特定年龄风险人群的健康影响。我们利用按性别和年龄分层的每日全因死亡率以及2002年至2008年日本9个城市的每日PM2.5来估算相对风险。然后,相对于现状,与两个假设的PM2.5相关缓解方案相比,将估计的风险用于共同收益/负担的经济价值评估:i)降低至日本标准,ii)降低至世卫组织标准。使用以下HIA指标评估了这些干预措施对健康的影响:可归因的死亡率,可归因的生命损失和环境健康影响。 PM2.5升高10μg/ m(3)将使全因死亡率的风险增加0.52%(95%CI:-0.91%至1.99%),每个亚组的风险估算值有所不同。据估计,目前的经济负担很高,对于不同年龄段的死亡率,其负担差异尤为明显。 0.40万亿日元(0-64日元)和1.50万亿日元(> 64日元)。如果要执行相对于现状更严格的标准(即WHO标准),则在相同风险人群中有可能产生经济利益; 0.26万亿日元(0-64日元)和0.98万亿日元(> 64日元)。我们没有发现与特定性别死亡率相关的负担和收益有任何实质性差异。使用估计的本地风险系数和风险评估,决策机构将有机会运营自己的HIA,以评估与空气污染相关的健康影响。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号