首页> 外文期刊>Environment, development and sustainability >Accountability in climate change governance and Caribbean SIDS
【24h】

Accountability in climate change governance and Caribbean SIDS

机译:气候变化治理和加勒比小岛屿发展中国家的问责制

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The good governance of institutions and regimes requires accountability suited to the particular context of each institution and regime. The paper examines the nature of accountability in climate change governance using the Caribbean region as a case study. In doing so, the paper makes two original contributions. First, using insights from the environmental governance literature, it presents a conceptual framework that categorises the types (levels, relationships and mechanisms) of accountability in governance that can be used to test accountability. The accountability framework comprises two levels (internal/external accountability); four relationships (normative, relational, decision and behavioural); and four mechanisms or processes through which accountability can be exercised (certification, monitoring, participation by stakeholders in the overseeing of projects and self-reporting). Second, through an analysis of survey and interview responses from Caribbean climate change experts, it reports on the nature of accountability in climate change governance in the context of Caribbean Small Island Developing States. To do this, first it identifies the actors involved in Caribbean climate governance at the regional and national scales. Then, using the framework, it examines which levels, relationships and processes exist within and between climate governance regional institutions, international partners, government agencies, non-governmental organisations and the private sector for climate change adaptation and mitigation efforts. The paper draws two main conclusions: first, generally actors valued accountability as a good governance norm. Secondly, limited resources and the perception that using the accountability mechanisms will retard policy implementation led to low levels of accountability in practice. Finally, the study examined how accountability can be enhanced in the climate change sector by ensuring that each of the elements of the framework is operationalised for both state and non-state climate change projects.
机译:机构和制度的良好治理要求问责制适合每个机构和制度的特定情况。本文以加勒比地区为例,研究了气候变化治理中问责制的性质。在此过程中,本文做出了两个原始贡献。首先,利用来自环境治理文献的见解,它提出了一个概念框架,该框架对治理中问责制的类型(级别,关系和机制)进行了分类,可用于测试问责制。问责框架包括两个级别(内部/外部问责制);四个关系(规范,关系,决策和行为);以及可以执行问责制的四个机制或过程(认证,监控,利益相关者参与项目监督和自我报告)。其次,通过对加勒比气候变化专家的调查和访谈答复的分析,报告了加勒比小岛屿发展中国家在气候变化治理中问责制的性质。为此,首先要确定在区域和国家范围内参与加勒比气候治理的参与者。然后,利用该框架,研究气候治理区域机构,国际伙伴,政府机构,非政府组织和私营部门之间以及在气候变化适应和缓解工作中存在哪些层次,关系和过程。本文得出两个主要结论:首先,一般而言,行为者将问责制视为良好的治理规范。第二,有限的资源以及使用问责机制会阻碍政策实施的观念导致实践中的问责水平较低。最后,该研究探讨了如何通过确保针对国家和非国家气候变化项目实施框架的每个要素来增强气候变化部门的责任制。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号