首页> 外文期刊>Environment, development and sustainability >Reviewing the strategies for climate change and sustainability after the US defiance of the Paris Agreement:an AHP-GMCR-based conflict resolution approach
【24h】

Reviewing the strategies for climate change and sustainability after the US defiance of the Paris Agreement:an AHP-GMCR-based conflict resolution approach

机译:审查美国蔑视巴黎协定后的气候变化与可持续性战略:基于AHP-GMCR的冲突解决方法

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

In the landmark Paris Agreement, the global economies agreed to put forward their best efforts in mitigation and adaptation of climate change. The member countries set their international and national targets to limit global temperature rise within 2 degrees C. The major and developed economics play a productive role in achieving the goals set in the Paris Agreement and failing would make it hard for the global community to limit the global temperature within the targeted range. The announcement of the USA to back out of the Paris Agreement has caused uncertainty in the global climate governance (GCG) regime. The present study overviews how the US defiance is likely to affect emission space, carbon prices, and macroeconomic conditions of the economies. It also focuses on the objective to analyze multiple strategic scenarios regarding GCG considering the role of three major contributors to GHG emissions-the USA, the EU, and China. An integrated conflict resolution strategy has been proposed by combining the analytical hierarchy process and attitude-based graph model for conflict resolution. The possible post-withdrawal scenarios based on possible alternatives for the GCG regime has been examined. This study incorporates influence power-based and attitude-based approaches to generate preference rankings of the alternative GCG strategies. The influence power-based and attitude-based preferences are used in general stability and attitude-based stability analyses to explore equilibrium GCG strategies. The analyses reveal that influence power and attitudes of the decision-makers (DMs) influence the preferences of DMs. This influence on preferences has implications on the outcomes of the GCG scenarios. The results of the influence power-based and attitude-based analyses imply that the collective GCG strategies are indispensable to protect the shared natural climate for environmental sustainability and development.
机译:在里程碑意义的巴黎协定中,全球经济同意提出减缓和适应气候变化的最佳努力。成员国将其国际和国家目标限制在2摄氏度范围内的全球温度上升。主要和发达的经济学在实现巴黎协议中所设定的目标方面发挥了富有成效的作用,并失败将使全球社区限制难以实现这一目标目标范围内的全球温度。美国宣布退出巴黎协定的宣布在全球气候治理(GCG)制度中造成了不确定性。本研究概述了美国蔑视的蔑视可能会影响经济体的排放空间,碳价格和宏观经济条件。它还专注于分析关于GCG的多种战略情景的目的,考虑到三大贡献者对GHG排放的作用 - 美国,欧盟和中国的作用。通过结合分析层次流程和基于态度的图形模型来解决冲突解决方案的综合冲突解决策略。研究了基于GCG制度的可能替代方案的可能的退出场景。本研究纳入了基于权力和基于态度的方法,以产生替代GCG策略的偏好排名。基于功率的和姿态的偏好用于普遍稳定性和基于姿态的稳定性分析,以探索均衡GCG策略。分析显示,决策者(DMS)的影响力和态度影响DMS的偏好。这种对偏好的影响对GCG情景的结果有影响。基于权力和基于姿态的分析的结果意味着集体GCG策略是保护对环境可持续性和发展的共同自然气候不可或缺的。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号