首页> 外文期刊>Environment, development and sustainability >Investigating the environmental impacts of alternative fuel usage in cement production: a life cycle approach
【24h】

Investigating the environmental impacts of alternative fuel usage in cement production: a life cycle approach

机译:研究水泥生产中替代燃料使用的环境影响:生命周期方法

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Cement production is a complex process including the use of a high amount of raw materials and energy, and it causes significant emissions such as carbon dioxide and nitrogen oxide. However, the use of alternative fuels in cement production has ecological, economic, and social benefits. In this study, the environmental impacts of alternative fuel usage in cement production process were determined by life cycle assessment (LCA) using two methods: (1) IMPACT 2002+ for determining the effects on climate change, human health, ecosystem quality, and resources and (2) Hoekstra et al. (2012) for determining the effect on water scarcity. For this purpose, firstly, LCA of cement production was conducted for the present situation (PS) in Turkey. Secondly, three scenarios (S1, S2, and S3) were built which include different substitution rates (15% and 30%) and different alternative fuels (refuse-derived fuel [RDF] and thermally dried sludge [DS]). The results indicate that the use of RDF as an alternative fuel is more environmentally friendly than the use of DS in cement production. Climate change, one of the most significant impacts derived from cement production, reduces 27% and 12% with the 30% and 15% substitution rate of fossil fuel by RDF for all cement types, respectively. On the contrary, with the use of DS (substitution rate of 15%), climate change increases about 0.5% compared with PS conspicuously. Considering results in terms of water scarcity assessment, it is concluded that electricity consumption is the most significant process contributed to water scarcity because of the production process of electricity.
机译:水泥生产是一种复杂的过程,包括使用大量的原料和能量,并且它导致显着的排放如二氧化碳和氮氧化物。然而,在水泥生产中使用替代燃料具有生态,经济和社会效益。在这项研究中,使用两种方法的生命周期评估(LCA)确定了水泥生产过程中替代燃料使用的环境影响:(1)2002+用于确定气候变化,人类健康,生态系统质量和资源的影响和(2)Hoekstra等。 (2012)用于确定水资源稀缺的影响。为此目的,首先,对土耳其的目前情况(PS)进行了水泥生产的LCA。其次,构建了三种场景(S1,S2和S3),其包括不同的取代率(15%和30%)和不同的替代燃料(垃圾衍生的燃料[RDF]和热干燥污泥[DS])。结果表明,RDF作为替代燃料的使用比在水泥生产中的使用更环保。气候变化,水泥生产最大的影响之一,分别降低了27%和12%,分别通过RDF为所有水泥类型的化石燃料替换为30%和15%。相反,随着DS(替代率为15%),气候变化与PS显着增加约0.5%。考虑到水资源稀缺评估的结果,得出的结论是,电力消耗是由于电力生产过程导致水资源稀缺的最重要过程。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号