首页> 外文期刊>Environment and planning >Constructing authority: Embodied expertise, homegrown neoliberalism, and the globalization of Singapore's private planning
【24h】

Constructing authority: Embodied expertise, homegrown neoliberalism, and the globalization of Singapore's private planning

机译:建设权威:经验丰富的专业知识,本土的新自由主义以及新加坡私人计划的全球化

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The rise of global urban consultancy and the role of private planners in facilitating “knowledge transfer” between cities have received much critical attention in the recent years. Notwithstanding the burgeoning literature critiquing such neoliberal “fast policy” transfer, little is understood in terms of the nuanced politics of expertise and the careering practices of urban consultants in negotiating the diverse international planning fields through their embodied knowledge. Using Singapore as a case study, this paper investigates how ‘homegrown neoliberal’ urban consultancy firms from the city-state operate overseas and interrogates the unwieldy geographies and histories behind the travel of the Singapore model. To the extent that Singapore has often been held up as an exemplary urban model, this paper is interested in how Singaporean planners negotiate foreign planning cultures and assert their authority as urban experts by positioning themselves in elite policy networks to strategically exploit their liminal status as public/private planners. In doing so, the paper not only sheds light on the politics of urban knowledge and expertise but also disrupts hegemonic understanding of neoliberalism by acknowledging the diverse histories and conjunctural contexts that underpin the globalization of private planning.
机译:近年来,全球城市咨询的兴起以及私人规划师在促进城市之间“知识转移”方面的作用受到了广泛的关注。尽管新兴文学批评这种新自由主义的“快速政策”转移,但对于细致入微的专业知识政治和城市顾问通过其丰富的知识来谈判各种国际规划领域的职业顾问的实践,人们了解得很少。本文以新加坡为例,研究了这个城市国家的“本土新自由主义”城市咨询公司如何在海外开展业务,并审视了新加坡模式旅行背后的笨拙地理位置和历史。在一定程度上,新加坡经常被视为城市典范,本文对新加坡规划师如何通过协商他们的外国规划文化以及通过将自己置于精英政策网络中以战略性地利用其作为公职的地位来确立其作为城市专家的权威感兴趣。 /私人规划师。通过这样做,本文不仅阐明了城市知识和专业知识的政治意义,而且通过承认支撑私人计划全球化的各种历史和合宪情境,破坏了对新自由主义的霸权理解。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号